Introduction: An Epic for a Species

From the great flood myths of Mesopotamia to the epic quests of Arthur and Odysseus, humanity has long sought to understand its tumultuous history through the lens of narrative. These foundational stories, woven into the fabric of our cultures, are not merely tales of adventure; they are psychological roadmaps for the human soul. At their core lies the archetypal structure of the Hero’s Journey, a framework that Joseph Campbell, the great mythologist, found to be universal in its revelation and function. As Campbell observed, these heroic tales “provide a field in which you can locate yourself” and “carry the individual through the stages of life”.1 Their central purpose is to guide the hero through a process of transformation, where a former, self-centered version of the self undergoes a symbolic “death” to be reborn into a new state of being—one that sees the world not “through a glass darkly” but with clarity and a sense of “union with all of humanity”.1

Today, as our species navigates a maelstrom of global crises—climate change, the rise of artificial intelligence, profound social fragmentation, and escalating geopolitical tension—it is natural to feel adrift. The sheer scale and interconnectedness of these challenges can defy comprehension, overwhelming our capacity to respond. But what if these crises are not a chaotic end-state but rather a call to a new, species-level adventure? What if humanity, as a collective protagonist, is being summoned to undertake a heroic journey? This report explores that possibility, using the framework of Campbell’s Hero’s Journey to provide a new narrative for our time. It will chart our course from the “Ordinary World” of the early 21st century to the “Call to Adventure” of our present-day crises. It will then examine the “Refusal” and “Shadow” that have held us back, before revealing the “Allies” and “Elixir” that suggest a path toward a profound collective transformation and a new “Return.”

The Ordinary World and the Herald’s Call

The opening act of any great myth introduces us to the Hero in their “Ordinary World”—a place that, for all its comforts and routines, contains an inherent lack or subtle vulnerability.2 For humanity, our Ordinary World was the dawn of the 21st century. It was a period marked by unprecedented globalization, interconnectedness, and a narrative of unstoppable progress. The world economy expanded at a staggering rate, more than doubling from $42 trillion in 2000 to $101 trillion in 2022.3 This expansion was accompanied by remarkable gains in human well-being. Extreme poverty was drastically reduced, falling from nearly 38% in 1990 to just 9% by 2022, while global life expectancy increased significantly.3 The proliferation of technology was equally transformative. The internet and mobile phones, once luxuries, became near-universal, connecting billions of people and creating a global web of communication and commerce.3 This era also saw groundbreaking scientific achievements, from the completion of the Human Genome Project to the nascent stages of AI development, which were lauded as the harbingers of a new, technologically advanced society.3

However, the narrative of this Ordinary World was a mirage. The very data that painted a picture of progress also revealed a state of fundamental instability, a prelude to the coming storm. The global capitalist system, while expanding, was simultaneously experiencing what one expert has called its “worst crisis in its 500 year history”.5 Its deep structural flaws, from the extreme concentration of wealth to the marginalization of large portions of humanity, were eroding its legitimacy and sustainability.5 This mirrors the psychological setup of the Hero’s Journey, where the hero’s familiar world is not a state of true balance but one of dynamic tension, ripe for disruption. The “Long Peace” of the post-World War II era, which seemed to be holding, was merely a fragile state of affairs.3 It was a world fast approaching the ecological limits of its reproduction, with global warming already described by a UN Secretary-General as an “existential threat”.3 Our collective narrative of progress was in fact a veil, concealing a quiet, creeping decay that would eventually make our Ordinary World untenable.

The disruption began with the Heralds’ Call, a cascade of four interconnected crises that shattered the illusion of stability and summoned humanity to a new path. The first was the relentless progression of climate change, a crisis foretold by scientists for nearly two centuries, with early observations of the greenhouse effect dating back to 1824 and the link to carbon dioxide in 1856.6 While the warnings have been consistent, the rate of change has accelerated dramatically, more than tripling since 1975.7 Today, we stand at an irreversible threshold, with the 10 warmest years in recorded history having occurred in the past decade alone.7 The second Herald is artificial intelligence, a technology with ancient roots in human ambition to create thinking machines.4 With the rise of deep learning and generative AI in the 2010s and 2020s, that dream has become a reality, introducing a “new biological era for the human species” that is largely uncharted and poses profound ethical and societal questions.3

The third Herald is social fragmentation, a phenomenon that has torn the social fabric of nations and threatened the resilience of societies.10 This erosion of a common public space, fueled by digital echo chambers and the proliferation of disinformation, has led to a rise in political and affective polarization, impeding consensus on critical global issues like climate change.10 Finally, the fourth Herald is geopolitical tension, manifested in the return of large-scale conflicts and the rising specter of a breakdown in global stability.13 These conflicts threaten the very global supply chains and trade routes that underpinned the peace and prosperity of our Ordinary World, creating a knock-on effect of economic and social disruption.13

A deeper examination reveals that these Heralds are not isolated, but are a mutually constitutive system of threats.5 For instance, climate change increases pressure on key resources like food and water, which fuels geopolitical tension and civil conflict.13 Social polarization slows down the ability of political leaders to reach a consensus and act on crises like climate change and the ethical governance of AI.10 The rise of AI, in turn, can either amplify or mitigate these problems, creating unprecedented risks and opportunities within an already unstable global system.14 The Call to Adventure for humanity is therefore not a single clarion call, but a complex, multi-dimensional crisis of our very being, consciousness, and social structures.5 It demands a holistic, systemic response, marking a new epoch in human history.

The Refusal of the Call and the Meeting with the Shadow

Faced with a summons to adventure, the hero’s first instinct is often to refuse the call, to retreat to the comfort of the familiar.2 For humanity, this refusal manifests as a widespread and perplexing inertia in the face of existential threats. The phenomenon of collective inaction is a key component of this refusal. It describes a psychological state where a group, despite recognizing a shared threat, fails to coordinate and implement the necessary actions to address it.15 The reasons for this are rooted in human psychology, including the diffusion of responsibility and the lure of the “free ride.” In a large group, it becomes easy for each individual to assume someone else will take care of the problem, diluting personal accountability and creating a disincentive to act.15 This is a central theme in the “tragedy of the commons,” where a group collectively fails to manage a shared resource even when the dire consequences are fully understood.15 The problem feels distant—geographically, temporally, and socially—which diminishes the emotional urgency to act, even as the scientific warnings become more dire.15

This psychological inertia is amplified by profound political and institutional barriers. Despite the fact that a majority of the world’s population views climate change as a major threat 17, political leaders often fail to act. The data points to a significant disconnect, where politicians can underestimate public concern and are reticent to change their policy platforms due to elite capture by powerful interests and the high political costs of taking action.18 Even when informed that voters demand action, politicians can be too hesitant to alter their stance.18 This is the paradox of our era: we know the path toward a better future, but we are held back by a collective “weakness of will” that prevents us from making the necessary contribution.16 This refusal is not a simple choice; it is a deep-seated human resistance to change and a fear of the unknown that is as old as the Luddite movement’s reaction to automation. The Luddites, often misunderstood as anti-technology, were primarily skilled artisans who feared that new machinery would displace them, leading to a loss of livelihood and a decline in working conditions.19 Their resistance was not to the machines themselves, but to the disruption and loss of what was familiar, a pattern that continues today in the face of technological advances like AI.19

The Hero’s Journey also requires the protagonist to confront their inner flaws, or “Shadow”—the parts of the self that are unconscious, repressed, and often hidden from view.20 For humanity, our collective Shadow is the ancient, primal capacity for tribalism and hostility. In the 21st century, this shadow has been externalized and amplified by digital technologies, creating an unprecedented level of societal polarization.10 This is not just a disagreement over policy; it is “affective polarization,” an animus and outright dislike for those who disagree with us politically.21 The research shows that this demonization of political opponents, fueled by inflammatory rhetoric from political elites and media personalities, has reached new heights in recent years.22 One analysis found that the use of “demonizing communication style” has become widespread, with some political leaders quadrupling their use of divisive language.22 Digital platforms, with their algorithmic incentive structures, act as a powerful and dangerous digital mirror, reflecting and strengthening our collective shadow. The algorithms are programmed to promote content that drives engagement, and “negativity and moral outrage” are highly effective at doing so.21 This creates a vicious feedback loop where our primal capacity for division is not only validated but financially rewarded, leading to a society that is increasingly fragmented along partisan lines.10 The World Economic Forum has identified this phenomenon as one of the world’s top global risks.10 The central trial for the collective hero is to confront this shadow—to look at our tribalism and division not as an external force but as an internal flaw—and to begin the difficult work of re-humanizing the “other” in an age of technological fragmentation.

Trials, Allies, and the Ordeal of Unity

Having refused the call and confronted the shadow, the Hero is now fully engaged in the “initiation” phase, facing a series of daunting Trials.2 For humanity, the trials are the full, devastating force of the crises that have summoned us. They include the continued rise in global temperatures, which has now made the last decade the warmest in recorded history 7; the threat of large-scale geopolitical conflicts that jeopardize critical global systems like food and energy supply chains 13; and the immense, largely uncharted risks of AI, from algorithmic bias and privacy concerns to the potential for widespread social disruption.8

But the hero is never alone on their journey; they inevitably find Allies.2 In humanity’s collective narrative, these allies are emerging in the form of new models of collaboration and cooperation that point toward a path beyond the old paradigms. These allies are not single heroes or saviors, but rather a decentralized, multi-faceted network of groups and initiatives. For example, in global governance, the Paris Agreement stands as a landmark achievement, a “binding agreement [that] brings all nations together to combat climate change” for the first time.23 The agreement operates on a five-year cycle of progressively ambitious national climate plans, or Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), and provides a framework for financial, technical, and capacity-building support to developing nations.23 This is a model that moves away from a single, top-down mandate toward a collective, shared responsibility. The Montreal Protocol on chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) offers a historical parallel of a successful collaboration that effectively addressed a global environmental threat.24

A similar pattern of cooperation is emerging in the realm of AI development. The rise of open-source AI, where datasets, code, and model parameters are freely available, is a powerful counter-narrative to the idea that powerful AI must be controlled by a few centralized actors.25 This approach democratizes access to cutting-edge tools, lowering the barrier to entry for smaller organizations and independent developers.25 It promotes a “polyculture” of innovation rather than an “AI monoculture” dominated by large corporations.26 This collaborative model, along with the development of global ethical frameworks like the UNESCO Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence and the IBM AI Ethics Board, provides a pathway for ensuring AI systems are developed responsibly with human rights and values at their core.27

Beyond formal institutions, the most powerful allies are emerging at the grassroots level. The “Greta effect,” which saw a critical mass of nonviolent protest spark political change, demonstrates the power of popular movements to shift the conversation and demand action.17 The

UK grassroots aid movement during the 2015 refugee crisis showed how private individuals and groups with no prior NGO experience could self-organize and fill the gaps in the system, providing direct, people-to-people aid and saving lives.29 Similarly, the rise of citizen science projects allows ordinary individuals to contribute directly to global research, from classifying galaxies for NASA to tracking climate data in their local communities.30 This is a crucial shift in the narrative, moving beyond the traditional archetype of the masculine “savior” who single-handedly saves the day, an archetype that can disempower us and cause us to give our power away.32 Instead, the evidence points to a new archetype: the Collective Journey. The “hero” is no longer a single, individual actor but a decentralized, cohesive collective that is “both the sum of all individuals and also a new entity entirely”.32

The Transformation and the Return with the Elixir

The central, most profound stage of the Hero’s Journey is the “Ordeal,” a moment of symbolic death and rebirth that changes the hero at a fundamental level.2 For humanity, this ordeal is the crucible of our current crises, and the transformation it calls for is not merely political or economic, but a fundamental shift in consciousness. As Campbell’s work has shown, the hero’s transformation involves a shift from a preoccupation with the self to a “truly heroic transformation” where one cultivates a greater purpose of compassionate unification with all humanity.1 This psychological shift from “egocentricity to sociocentricity” is not an isolated event; it echoes Carl Jung’s concept of individuation, a process of psychological growth that moves beyond a self-focused ego-identity toward an awareness of the “collective, undivided nature of being and people’s unity with all things”.1

This psychological imperative is surprisingly supported by an evolutionary view of our species. The sheer scale of human cooperation is an evolutionary puzzle; it has long been a subject of inquiry among biologists and anthropologists.36 All evidence suggests that at some point in our history, humans evolved the capacity to learn from each other and to engage in cumulative cultural evolution, which in turn led to a new kind of social selection.36 This new environment favored genes that gave rise to “pro-social motives” and “other regarding motives like empathy and social emotions like shame”.36 The transformation required of us today—a movement toward greater cooperation and unity—is not a novel, unrealistic spiritual fantasy, but a continuation of a profound evolutionary process that has been shaping our species for hundreds of thousands of years.36

This convergence of scientific, psychological, and spiritual perspectives is a central theme of our collective journey. Many philosophical and spiritual traditions describe this epochal moment as a “collective awakening,” a “giant leap” in human consciousness where we recognize our deep, fundamental interconnectedness with all life.38 As one spiritual tradition notes, “energetically we are fragments of a much bigger system,” and our individual thoughts, emotions, and beliefs contribute to a collective energetic field.38 When we heal ourselves and cultivate compassion, we add to the side of a great “tug-of-war” that pulls humanity toward a higher frequency.38 This is not a call to utopia but to a profound evolution of our consciousness, a necessary step for a species that has already become a collective.39 The true elixir of this journey is not a material object or a single policy, but a new state of being forged in the fires of crisis.

The treasure that the collective hero brings back from the journey is the Elixir, which has the power to transform the world as the hero has been transformed.2 For humanity, the Elixir is multi-faceted. First, it is Resilience, defined not just as the ability to “bounce back” but to “bounce forward,” finding a lesson and a path forward through a crisis.41 This resilience is fostered by our relationships with others and our communities, which are essential sources of strength in times of adversity.41 Second, the Elixir is Hope, a powerful emotion that sustains collective action and provides long-term motivation.40 Unlike reactive emotions like anger or fear, hope is proactive; it is a “goal-directed energy and the belief in pathways to achieve those goals”.40 It allows individuals to see a way forward and to collaborate on solutions.40

Finally, the Elixir is the knowledge to build new social and economic models that are no longer based on the unsustainable foundations of the old world. The existence of intentional communities like Findhorn in Scotland and Auroville in India, which prioritize sustainability, communal enjoyment, and local economic development, demonstrates that alternative ways of living are not mere hypotheticals but already-existing realities.33 These communities serve as living laboratories, pioneering sustainable practices in building, agriculture, and energy use.33 New economic theories like

post-growth and degrowth also offer a pathway beyond the old, tired debate of capitalism versus socialism.43 These models challenge the notion that infinite economic growth is possible on a finite planet, instead advocating for a shift in focus toward human capacity development, well-being, and a more equitable relationship with our environment.43

Conclusion: Answering the Call

We stand at the final stage of the collective journey, at a crossroads between a return to the chaos of the past and a leap toward a transformed future. The Ordinary World of the 20th century is gone, its illusion of stability shattered by the Heralds’ Call. We have felt the tempting pull of the Refusal and have seen the magnified reflection of our Shadow in the digital mirror. Yet, our Allies are already rising. They are the frameworks for global governance, the spirit of open-source collaboration, and the power of grassroots movements and individual action. The Elixir—a new consciousness, a new hope, and new models for living—is within our grasp.

The Hero’s Journey is not a story of one individual’s sacrifice, but rather a profound myth of rebirth that is “infinite in its revelation”.1 For humanity, this is the most daunting and yet most hopeful chapter in our story. The final question is not, “Are we ready to answer the call?” but rather, “Are we—all of us, together—ready to answer the call?” The answer will not come from a single hero but from a million small, individual acts of choice. Every time a person chooses to seek understanding over animus, to foster hope over despair, or to take action for the common good, they are weaving a new thread in the tapestry of our collective story. We have arrived at the threshold, and the most challenging and meaningful adventure in human history has just begun.

Works cited

1. The Metamorphosis of the Hero: Principles, Processes, and Purpose – PMC, accessed September 1, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6437092/
2. The Psychology of The Hero’s Journey | by Nathan Baugh | Medium, accessed September 1, 2025, https://medium.com/@nathan.baugh/the-psychology-of-the-heros-journey-0bda883de114
3. 21st century – Wikipedia, accessed September 1, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/21st_century
4. The History of Artificial Intelligence – IBM, accessed September 1, 2025, https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/history-of-artificial-intelligence
5. Global Capitalism: Crisis of Humanity and the Specter of 21st Century Fascism – William I. Robinson, accessed September 1, 2025, https://robinson.faculty.soc.ucsb.edu/Assets/pdf/Crisis%20of%20Humanity.pdf
6. Awareness of Human-Caused Climate Change | CFR Education, accessed September 1, 2025, https://education.cfr.org/learn/timeline/climate-science-history
7. Climate change: global temperature, accessed September 1, 2025, https://www.climate.gov/news-features/understanding-climate/climate-change-global-temperature
8. Artificial Intelligence Ethics Framework for the Intelligence Community – INTEL.gov, accessed September 1, 2025, https://www.intelligence.gov/ai/ai-ethics-framework
9. What is AI Governance? – IBM, accessed September 1, 2025, https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/ai-governance
10. The Polarizing Impact of Political Disinformation and Hate Speech: A Cross-country Configural Narrative – PMC – PubMed Central, accessed September 1, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10106894/
11. Full article: Polarization, fragmentation, and democratic deconsolidation in interwar Europe, accessed September 1, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13510347.2025.2537218
12. Social Media, Echo Chambers, and Political Polarization (Chapter 3), accessed September 1, 2025, https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/social-media-and-democracy/social-media-echo-chambers-and-political-polarization/333A5B4DE1B67EFF7876261118CCFE19
13. Geopolitical Conflict – Lloyd’s, accessed September 1, 2025, https://www.lloyds.com/insights/futureset/futureset-insights/systemic-risk-scenarios/geopolitical-conflict
14. TRANSFORMATIONS: SOCIAL AND CULTURAL DYNAMICS IN THE DIGITAL AGE – CHANSE, accessed September 1, 2025, https://chanse.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/CHANSE_call-theme.pdf
15. Collective Inaction → Term, accessed September 1, 2025, https://lifestyle.sustainability-directory.com/term/collective-inaction/
16. Collective inaction, omission, and non-action: when not acting is indeed on ‘us’, accessed September 1, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/364312961_Collective_inaction_omission_and_non-action_when_not_acting_is_indeed_on_’us’
17. Politics of climate change – Wikipedia, accessed September 1, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politics_of_climate_change
18. Climate politics: Understanding political inaction on climate change, accessed September 1, 2025, https://voxdev.org/topic/energy-environment/climate-politics-understanding-political-inaction-climate-change
19. Historical Examples of Opposition to Technological Progress …, accessed September 1, 2025, https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/6aRANeq89z4n7Kxz4/historical-examples-of-opposition-to-technological-progress
20. Jungian archetypes – Wikipedia, accessed September 1, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jungian_archetypes
21. How social media platforms can reduce polarization – Brookings Institution, accessed September 1, 2025, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/how-social-media-platforms-can-reduce-polarization/
22. Political polarization in the United States – Wikipedia, accessed September 1, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_polarization_in_the_United_States
23. The Paris Agreement | UNFCCC, accessed September 1, 2025, https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement
24. Climate Change and International Cooperation – Harvard ALI Social Impact Review, accessed September 1, 2025, https://www.sir.advancedleadership.harvard.edu/articles/climate-change-and-international-cooperation
25. Open-source artificial intelligence – Wikipedia, accessed September 1, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-source_artificial_intelligence
26. Open Source AI – Open Source Initiative, accessed September 1, 2025, https://opensource.org/ai
27. Ethics of Artificial Intelligence | UNESCO, accessed September 1, 2025, https://www.unesco.org/en/artificial-intelligence/recommendation-ethics
28. Responsible AI – IBM, accessed September 1, 2025, https://www.ibm.com/trust/responsible-ai
29. Grassroots – Wikipedia, accessed September 1, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grassroots
30. Citizen Science, accessed September 1, 2025, https://science.nasa.gov/citizen-science/
31. Research at Home: Citizen Science, accessed September 1, 2025, https://www.societyforscience.org/research-at-home/citizen-science/
32. From the Hero’s Journey to Our Collective Journey | by Maya zuckerman | Regenerative Narrative | Medium, accessed September 1, 2025, https://medium.com/regenerative-narrative/transformative-media-from-the-heros-journey-to-our-collective-journey-246780b42bcd
33. Examples of Thriving Sustainable Communities – Everick Foundation, accessed September 1, 2025, https://everickfoundation.com/examples-of-thriving-sustainable-communities/
34. Ecovillages From Around the World for Sustainable Living – Earth.Org, accessed September 1, 2025, https://earth.org/ecovillages-from-around-the-world-for-sustainable-living/
35. Jungian archetypes and the collective unconscious | EBSCO Research Starters, accessed September 1, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/jungian-archetypes-and-collective-unconscious
36. Culture and the evolution of human cooperation – PMC, accessed September 1, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2781880/
37. Evolutionary spirituality – Tree of Life ~ Spiritual Practice Education, accessed September 1, 2025, https://www.treeoflifespirituality.com/the-sacred-work-of-being-human/evolutionary-spirituality
38. Collective Consciousness Meaning: How We’re All Connected, accessed September 1, 2025, https://soulseekerspath.com/collective-consciousness-spirituality/
39. Collective shifts in consciousness and your Soul Mission | by Nicole Drummond – Medium, accessed September 1, 2025, https://medium.com/@nicole_drummond/collective-shifts-in-consciousness-and-your-soul-mission-335908ba7666
40. ijhssm.org, accessed September 1, 2025, https://ijhssm.org/issue_dcp/Hope%20and%20Political%20Change%20the%20Role%20of%20Positive%20Emotions%20in%20Mobilizing%20Social%20Movements.pdf
41. Resilience in the Face of Disaster | Psychology Today, accessed September 1, 2025, https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/path-of-optimal-living/202501/resilience-in-the-face-of-disaster
42. Crisis and resilience in psychology – DOAJ, accessed September 1, 2025, https://doaj.org/article/4eb5bce8a22049289411a73a58ca834c
43. Post-capitalism – Wikipedia, accessed September 1, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-capitalism
44. Roadmap to a New Economics: Beyond Capitalism and Socialism – ResearchGate, accessed September 1, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265034508_Roadmap_to_a_New_Economics_Beyond_Capitalism_and_Socialism