I. Introduction: The Enduring Question of Reality

Humanity has long grappled with the fundamental nature of reality, questioning whether our perceptions truly reflect an objective world or if we are, in some profound sense, living within a grand illusion. This inquiry, once confined to philosophical and mystical realms, now finds surprising echoes in the cutting-edge theories of modern physics. The persistent human fascination with this question, evident across diverse cultures and intellectual traditions separated by millennia, points to something deeper than mere coincidence. The widespread recurrence of the “illusion of reality” concept suggests either a fundamental psychological predisposition within the human mind to question the solidity of its perceptions or, more profoundly, an inherent structural quality of reality itself that reveals its non-absolute nature through different modes of inquiry—be it scientific observation, philosophical introspection, or mystical experience. This shared intuition across human history lends significant weight to the “illusion of reality” concept, moving it beyond a mere philosophical curiosity to a potentially universal truth about existence.

This report will explore how contemporary scientific paradigms, particularly quantum mechanics, the holographic principle, and the simulation hypothesis, converge with ancient wisdom traditions—such as Eastern philosophies of emptiness and Maya, and Western esoteric views of a degraded material world—to suggest that reality, as we commonly experience it, is far from a fixed, objective truth, but rather a dynamic, interconnected, and potentially illusory construct.

II. Defining Consciousness: The Gateway to Experience

Before exploring reality’s potentially illusory nature, it is essential to grapple with consciousness itself—the very medium through which the world is perceived. Despite its centrality to human experience, a universally accepted definition of consciousness remains elusive, highlighting the complexity of what philosophers term the “hard problem” of consciousness.

From a neuroscientific standpoint, normal human consciousness is understood as the presence of a wakeful arousal state coupled with the awareness and motivation to respond to internal and external stimuli.1 Arousal reflects the overall level of responsiveness to environmental stimuli and is supported by specific brain regions, including the brainstem, basal forebrain, and diencephalic areas. Awareness, conversely, is the brain’s ability to perceive specific environmental stimuli across different domains, such as visual, somatosensory, auditory, and interoceptive information. This process is dynamic and complex, involving a variety of cerebral networks, particularly interactions between the cortex and thalamic nuclei. Studies indicate that a normal conscious state encompasses volition, the processing of sensory information, and a generalized level of arousal.1

Cognitive science offers multiple perspectives on consciousness. An agent is considered conscious if it can have mental states of which it is aware, if it is not asleep, or if it can be conscious of some mental states but not others within its own mind.2 Conscious thought is often conceptualized as a valuable resource within the brain, for which unconscious processes compete for access. The definition of consciousness within neuroscience is continually shifting as scientists advance their understanding of these phenomena.2

Psychological insights broaden the definition to include the subjective, experiential aspect of consciousness. It encompasses all the daily experiences that constitute an individual’s awareness of their unique thoughts, memories, feelings, sensations, and environments. This awareness is inherently subjective and unique to each person, manifesting as an ever-shifting stream of thoughts and perceptions.3 Consciousness is not merely an “on” or “off” state but exists across different stages and levels throughout the day. These various states include dreams, hallucinations, hypnosis, meditation, sleep, and states induced by psychoactive drugs. Furthermore, higher states of consciousness are often associated with spiritual or mystical experiences, involving an elevated state of awareness that can lead to a greater sense of self and connection to the world, such as transcendence, mindfulness, or lucid dreaming.3

Philosophically, a conscious mental state is famously captured by Thomas Nagel’s “what it is like” sense, referring to the subjective, first-person point of view of being in that state.4 This qualitative aspect of experience is central to the “hard problem”—the challenge of explaining how physical processes give rise to subjective experience. Debates persist between dualistic views, which hold that the conscious mind or a conscious mental state is non-physical, and physicalist views, which assert that the mind is the brain or is caused by neural activity.4 Higher-order theories, for instance, propose that a mental state becomes conscious when the subject is aware of it in some sense.4 Philosophers also utilize the term “consciousness” to refer to general knowledge, intentionality, introspection (and the knowledge it generates), and phenomenal experience.5 Despite these varied explorations, a universally accepted operational definition remains elusive.3 René Descartes’ famous declaration, “I think, therefore I am,” underscores the self-evident reality of one’s existence and consciousness through the very act of thinking.3

The multi-faceted definitions of consciousness across neuroscience, cognitive science, and philosophy highlight a profound conceptual challenge. While neuroscience provides a functional understanding of how consciousness manifests in the brain, identifying its neural correlates and physiological basis, it primarily describes the mechanisms rather than explaining the subjective experience itself. This inherent gap in scientific explanation is why the “hard problem” of consciousness persists.7 The consistent lack of a unified definition across these disciplines underscores the inherent difficulty in fully capturing consciousness. This foundational ambiguity is critical when discussing how consciousness might interact with an illusory reality, as it suggests that a purely materialist explanation may be insufficient, opening the door for alternative frameworks, including those from ancient wisdom traditions, which often begin from the phenomenological experience that science struggles to fully explain.

The diverse array of conscious states, from basic arousal to profound spiritual experiences, suggests that consciousness is not a simple binary phenomenon but a rich, dynamic spectrum. This broad continuum, encompassing ordinary wakefulness, dreams, and meditative states, hints at a deeper, more expansive nature of consciousness that can transcend typical perception. This understanding provides a natural bridge to ancient wisdom traditions that explore altered states of awareness and their relationship to reality.

Furthermore, the emphasis on the subjective nature of experience—the “what it is like” quality of consciousness—is a consistent thread across these definitions. This focus on the individual, first-person perspective distinguishes consciousness from mere computational processing or objective brain activity. If reality is indeed an illusion, it is precisely this subjective, first-person experience of that illusion that defines our existence within it, making the nature of consciousness inextricably linked to the nature of perceived reality.

Table 1: Key Definitions of Consciousness

III. Modern Physics: Unveiling the Fabric of Illusion

Modern physics, particularly quantum mechanics, the holographic principle, and the simulation hypothesis, offers profound insights that challenge the classical, common-sense view of a solid, objective reality. These theories, though distinct, collectively suggest that reality may be far more fluid, interconnected, and potentially illusory than previously imagined.

A. Quantum Mechanics: The Unstable Ground of Reality

Quantum mechanics, the theory describing the behavior of matter and energy at the atomic and subatomic levels, fundamentally undermines the notion of a physical universe composed of solid, discrete particles. Early in the 20th century, physicists discovered that elementary “point particles” like electrons, muons, tauons, quarks, and gluons have no internal structure and no physical size; they are zero-dimensional and behave more like events or pure energy than tangible “things”.8 This concept, known as wave-particle duality, illustrates that these entities can exhibit properties of both waves and particles simultaneously, challenging classical concepts of what constitutes matter.8

The Copenhagen Interpretation, the most widely accepted interpretation of quantum mechanics among physicists, suggests that “reality”—the world as it is known—can only actualize if some form of measurement or observation takes place on the macroscopic level.8 This implies that particles remain in a probabilistic energy-wave state until interacted with, at which point they “collapse” into a definite location or state.8 This idea profoundly challenges the notion of an independent, objective reality existing prior to observation.9 Niels Bohr, a pioneer of quantum physics, stated that an independent reality, in the ordinary physical sense, cannot be ascribed to phenomena or the agencies of observation.9 Werner Heisenberg similarly implied that an accurate description of elementary particles suggests a non-objective reality.9

The “observer effect” in quantum mechanics refers to the disturbance of an observed system by the act of observation itself. This is often the result of instruments necessarily altering the state of what they measure.11 For instance, in the famous double-slit experiment, the act of detecting which slit a particle passes through changes its behavior from a wave-like interference pattern to a particle-like distribution.12 It is crucial to clarify that, according to the Copenhagen interpretation and leading physicists like Werner Heisenberg and Richard Feynman, the “observer” or “measurement” is merely a physical process, and it does not matter whether the observer is an apparatus or a human being.11 Feynman famously stated, “Nature does not know what you are looking at, and she behaves the way she is going to behave whether you bother to take down the data or not”.12 Despite these scientific clarifications, the misconception that a conscious mind directly affects reality persists in popular discourse, often creating a powerful cultural bridge to ancient spiritual ideas where consciousness is primary in shaping reality.8 The persistence of this popular interpretation, even if scientifically contested, highlights a human desire to place consciousness at the center of reality, mirroring ancient wisdom’s emphasis.

The “quantum measurement problem” remains one of the most enigmatic aspects of quantum mechanics. While a quantum state evolves deterministically under the Schrödinger Equation, forming superpositions (multiple possible states simultaneously), upon measurement, it stochastically collapses to a single outcome.10 This dual evolution has puzzled physicists and philosophers for nearly a century, leading to a “cacophony of competing interpretations,” with no single scientific consensus on how or why this collapse occurs.10 These interpretations, such as decoherence, the many-worlds interpretation, and objective collapse theories, present vastly different pictures of the physical world, and the question of how to decide between them remains open.10 The lack of a single, agreed-upon “truth” implies that our understanding of physical reality is far from complete and may be inherently open to multiple conceptual frameworks.

Quantum entanglement is another phenomenon that challenges classical notions of reality. It describes how two particles can become linked in such a way that the state of one instantly affects the state of the other, regardless of the distance separating them.8 This “spooky action at a distance,” as Einstein called it, suggests a universe that is fundamentally unified and interconnected, rather than composed of isolated, independent entities. This inherent, instantaneous interconnectedness provides a scientific basis for non-dualistic concepts found in ancient wisdom.

The quantum realm fundamentally undermines the classical, objective view of reality. The transition from probabilistic wave states to definite particles upon measurement, even if caused by an inanimate apparatus, suggests that reality is not inherently fixed or “out there” until interacted with.8 If particles are “more like events than things” 8 and their properties aren’t fixed until measured, then the very building blocks of reality are not solid. This directly challenges a materialistic, objective view and aligns with the idea of reality as a construct or projection.

B. The Holographic Principle: Our Universe as a Cosmic Projection

The holographic principle, a radical idea emerging from the study of quantum gravity and black holes, suggests that the three-dimensional reality we experience, including gravity, might be nothing more than an illusion—a hologram conjured up by a lower-dimensional reality.15 This principle posits that all the information content of a three-dimensional space can be encoded on a two-dimensional surface, much like a hologram emerges from a sheet of photographic film.17

This concept gained traction from observations about black holes, specifically that their entropy (a measure of disorder or information content) is proportional to their surface area, not their volume.16 This counter-intuitive finding suggests that information about objects that fall into a black hole remains encoded on its two-dimensional event horizon, rather than being lost within its three-dimensional volume.15 This implies that information is a more fundamental constituent of the universe than traditional matter or energy.17

According to this principle, the universe at its most fundamental level is made up of information, specifically quantum bits or “qubits”.17 Unlike conventional bits, qubits in the quantum realm are “flat” and spread out on a surface, increasing the surface area they occupy rather than volume. The holographic principle thus holds that our three-dimensional world is a representation or projection of the dynamic activity taking place on a two-dimensional surface populated by entangled qubits.17 This theoretical framework provides a concrete, albeit theoretical, physical model for an “illusory” reality, moving the concept from abstract philosophical speculation to a potentially verifiable scientific hypothesis.

The holographic principle, by suggesting our 3D reality is a projection from a lower-dimensional information surface 15, provides a concrete, albeit theoretical, physical model for an “illusory” reality. This moves the concept from abstract philosophical speculation to a potentially verifiable scientific hypothesis, directly mirroring ancient concepts of reality as a “projection” or “dream”.19 The scientific rigor behind this theory makes the “illusion” concept less metaphorical and more physically plausible.

C. The Simulation Hypothesis: A Digital Dreamscape?

The simulation hypothesis proposes that what individuals experience as the real world is, in fact, an artificial, computer-generated simulation.21 This idea has gained significant philosophical and scientific attention, notably through philosopher Nick Bostrom’s 2003 argument. Bostrom’s “trilemma” suggests that at least one of three propositions must be true: either civilizations capable of creating conscious simulations are technologically limited or self-destruct; or advanced civilizations choose not to create such simulations; or, if advanced civilizations do create them, the number of simulated beings would vastly outnumber those in “base reality,” making it highly probable that we are living in a simulation.21

This hypothesis aligns with idealist philosophical perspectives, which argue that reality is fundamentally mental or immaterial, by proposing that our perceived reality is a construct of information. Conversely, it challenges materialistic views by suggesting that physical reality itself might be a simulated construct, blurring the lines between the material and the virtual.22

Living in a simulated reality raises profound existential questions. If our existence is artificial, what is the purpose of our lives within such a framework? Do our actions and choices hold genuine meaning, or are they predetermined within the confines of the simulation?.22 Ethical considerations also emerge, such as the responsibilities of hypothetical creators and how moral principles might apply within a simulated world.22 Metaphysical speculation extends to the nature of consciousness and the soul, questioning their traditional definitions if minds are products of a simulated environment.22

The simulation hypothesis provides a modern, technological framework for the “dream” metaphor, making the illusion of reality relatable in contemporary terms. If reality is a simulation, then our experiences are “real” within the simulation, but the underlying reality is different. This mirrors the dream state where experiences are vivid but not “real” in the waking sense. The ethical and existential questions raised by the simulation hypothesis are analogous to those posed by ancient spiritual traditions about karma, dharma, and liberation from suffering in an illusory world.

IV. Ancient Wisdom: Echoes of an Illusory World

Long before the advent of modern physics, ancient wisdom traditions across both Eastern and Western philosophies explored the idea that our perceived reality might not be ultimate truth, but rather a form of illusion, dream, or a lower manifestation of a deeper reality.

A. Eastern Traditions: Emptiness, Projection, and the Dance of Maya

Eastern philosophies, particularly Buddhism and Hinduism (Advaita Vedanta), offer profound insights into the illusory nature of reality, though with nuanced distinctions.

Buddhism: Śūnyatā (Emptiness)

In Buddhism, Śūnyatā, often translated as “emptiness,” “vacuity,” or “voidness,” is a multifaceted philosophical concept. It can refer to an ontological feature of reality, a meditative state, or a phenomenological analysis of experience.23 Buddhism does not deny reality outright but illuminates it by understanding Śūnyatā and Māyā, encouraging individuals to see through the “veils of illusion”.24

In Theravāda Buddhism, suññatā (the Pali equivalent) primarily refers to the non-self (anattā) nature of the five aggregates of experience—form, sensation, perception, mental formations, and consciousness—and the six sense spheres. Phenomena are considered “empty” of a permanent, inherent self or anything pertaining to a self.23 This is illustrated through similes in texts like the

Pheṇapiṇḍūpama Sutta, where form is likened to a “lump of foam,” sensation to a “water bubble,” perception to a “mirage,” mental formations to a “plantain tree,” and cognition to a “magical illusion” (māyā). These terms—”void,” “hollow,” and “coreless”—describe things as deceptive, false, vain, and worthless, emphasizing their impermanent and conditional nature.23

In Mahāyāna Buddhism, śūnyatā refers to the tenet that “all things are empty of intrinsic existence and nature (svabhava)”.23 Phenomena are regarded as merely conceptual existents or constructs, and are frequently described as “illusions” (māyā) and “dreams” (svapna).23 The influential

Heart Sutra famously states, “Form is emptiness, emptiness is form; Emptiness is not separate from form, form is not separate from emptiness; Whatever is form is emptiness, whatever is emptiness is form,” implying that all perceived objects are “empty” of the fixed identity imputed by their labels.23 This perspective suggests that nothing is found to ultimately exist in a fundamental way, including even core Buddhist concepts like bodhisattvas or nirvana, which are also said to be empty and dream-like.23

The Mādhyamaka school, founded by Nāgārjuna, equates the emptiness of dharmas with their dependent origination, meaning they lack any permanent substance or intrinsic existence.23 Nāgārjuna argued that things are “mere conceptual constructs” because they are impermanent collections of causes and conditions. This philosophy distinguishes between “limited truth” (samvrtisatya), which refers to the conventional, phenomenal world, and “highest reality” (paramarthasatya), which is the ultimate truth of emptiness.23 This “two truths” doctrine provides a sophisticated philosophical framework to reconcile the apparent solidity of our everyday experience with the ultimate “illusory” nature of reality. This offers a conceptual tool for understanding how modern physics can describe a seemingly solid world at macro scales while revealing its non-fundamental nature at quantum scales.

The Buddhist concept of Śūnyatā (emptiness) directly parallels the quantum physics idea of reality’s non-physical, non-fixed nature. The assertion that phenomena lack “intrinsic existence” (svabhava) and are “like illusions” 23 aligns with quantum particles being “more like events than things” 8 and existing in probabilistic states until observed. Both challenge the notion of a solid, independent, objective reality. If things lack inherent existence and are dependently originated, they are not fundamentally “real” in a fixed sense. This resonates with the quantum idea that particles are not solid, fixed entities, but rather dynamic, probabilistic phenomena. The “illusion” here is not that things don’t appear, but that they don’t appear as they seem to inherently exist.

Hinduism: Māyā

In Hinduism, particularly within the Advaita Vedanta tradition, Māyā is a central concept often misunderstood as mere “illusion.” Instead, Māyā refers to the creative power of Brahman (the ultimate reality) that manifests the world as a “projection”.20 The world is not considered unreal or non-existent, but rather a dependent manifestation of Brahman, much like a dream exists in relation to the dreaming mind.20 It is an “expansion and expression of Brahman/Consciousness”.20

The illusion associated with Māyā arises when one grasps onto this projection as ultimate or independent, forgetting its source.20 The world, therefore, appears as many, arising from the singular Brahman as a projection or a dream, and subsiding back into it. This is akin to waves appearing and disappearing on the ocean of God’s pure consciousness.19 While Brahman is eternal and unchanging, what emerges from it through

Māyā is temporary and destructible.19

The Hindu concept of Māyā as a “projection” or “creative power” of Brahman 19 offers a direct ancient parallel to the Holographic Principle.19 Both describe reality as an emergent phenomenon, not inherently solid or independent, but rather a manifestation of a deeper, unified source (Brahman/information on a 2D surface). This shifts the question from “is reality real?” to “what is reality a projection of?”. The “projection” aspect of Māyā directly maps to the holographic principle’s projection of 3D from 2D. The source of the projection (Brahman, information) is the ultimate reality, making the projected world “illusory” in the sense of not being ultimately independent. This is a profound conceptual convergence.

In both Buddhism and Hinduism (Advaita Vedanta), consciousness, or a fundamental, unified awareness, is often posited as the ultimate ground from which the “illusory” or projected reality arises. In Hinduism, the world is seen as a “projection of Brahman,” which is also referred to as “Brahman/Consciousness”.20 In Buddhism, while not explicitly stating consciousness as the creator of illusion, the Yogācāra school posits that “everything we conceive results from the Eight Consciousnesses, and these ‘things’ are ‘mere concepts'” 23, implying consciousness as the medium of apparent reality. This commonality points to consciousness as foundational, foreshadowing modern theories of quantum consciousness that propose consciousness as a fundamental field.

The emphasis on impermanence and interdependence is a core truth in both traditions. In Buddhism, Śūnyatā is equated with dependent origination, meaning phenomena lack any permanent substance or intrinsic existence and are instead “impermanent collections of causes and conditions”.23 In Hinduism, while Brahman is eternal, the world that emerges through

Māyā is temporary and destructible.19 This consistent theme of impermanence and interdependence across both Eastern traditions aligns strongly with the dynamic and interconnected nature of reality observed in quantum mechanics and the holographic principle.14

B. Western Esotericism: Gnosis and the Ascent from Materiality

Western esoteric traditions, such as Gnosticism and Neoplatonism, also explore the idea of reality as a lower or illusory manifestation, though often with a more dualistic framing than their Eastern counterparts.

Gnosticism

Gnosticism, emerging in the early centuries of the Common Era, is characterized by its emphasis on gnosis, or secret, direct experiential knowledge, as the key to spiritual liberation and salvation.26 Central to Gnostic cosmology is the notion that the material world is a “realm of ignorance and illusion,” created not by the ultimate transcendent divine being, but by a lesser, often malevolent, demiurgic deity.21 This view implies a fundamental flaw or degradation in the material realm, from which the soul, containing a divine spark, seeks to escape and ascend to its true nature.26 The Gnostic perspective resonates with the idea of a “dream” or “simulation” that one needs to “awaken” from, with

gnosis serving as the means to break free from the constraints of this illusory world.

Neoplatonism

Neoplatonism, particularly the philosophy of Plotinus, presents a hierarchical model of reality that emanates from a single, supreme, and utterly transcendent source known as “The One”.27 The One is beyond all categories, including being and non-being, and is the ultimate cause of all reality, though it is not a part of that reality itself.27 From The One, reality unfolds through a process of emanation, like light shining from a source, becoming progressively less perfect and unified as it moves further away.28

The first emanation is the Nous, or divine mind, which contains the perfect forms of all things. From the Nous emanates the Soul, which acts as a bridge to the material world. The material world is the final and furthest emanation from The One, representing the lowest level of reality, characterized by multiplicity, change, and imperfection.28 While the material world is not considered “evil” or entirely unreal in the sense of non-existence, it is a “degradation or diminution of unity” from the ultimate source.30 The goal of human existence in Neoplatonism is to purify the soul and undertake an “upwards journey” (anabasis) to transcend the material world and return to its original state of unity with The One through philosophical contemplation and moral purification.29

These Western esoteric traditions, though distinct from modern physics, share the core idea that our immediate sensory experience is not the ultimate reality. The concept of gnosis or ascending to higher levels of reality parallels the scientific quest to understand the underlying nature of reality beyond surface appearances. The material world is framed as a degraded or flawed manifestation, distinct from a higher, purer divine realm, implying a dualistic separation between the divine and the material. This contrasts with the non-dualistic projection in Advaita Vedanta, where the material world is a manifestation of the same ultimate reality. The emphasis on gnosis—direct, experiential knowledge—as the means to understand the true nature of reality and transcend the limitations of the material world parallels the “direct experience” emphasized in Eastern mystical practices like meditation.

V. The Grand Convergence: Where Science and Wisdom Intersect

A remarkable convergence of ideas emerges when examining modern physics and ancient wisdom traditions, particularly concerning the nature of reality as an illusion or a non-fundamental construct. This intersection reveals shared themes that challenge conventional perceptions and point toward a deeper, more unified understanding of existence.

Shared Themes

Both Eastern mysticism and quantum physics challenge conventional notions of existence, emphasizing interdependence, impermanence, and the fluid, interconnected nature of reality.14 They suggest a universe far more mysterious and unified than our everyday experiences imply, questioning the apparent separateness of things.31 Buddhism, with its teaching on emptiness (Śūnyatā), explains the absence of inherent existence in all phenomena, aligning with quantum mechanics’ revelation of a universe governed by probabilities and interconnectedness.32

The role of consciousness and observation is a crucial point of intersection. Both disciplines suggest that our typical perception of a solid, unchanging reality is an illusion.31 In quantum mechanics, the observer effect implies that the act of observation has a profound impact on the outcome of an experiment, shaping the observed characteristics.14 While the scientific “observer” in quantum mechanics is understood as a physical process or detector 11, the philosophical implications often resonate with Eastern emphasis on the crucial role of consciousness and observation in shaping reality.14 This suggests that reality is shaped by the interaction between the observer and the observed, whether that observer is a quantum particle or a human mind.14

Specific Parallels

The concept of Indra’s Net from Hindu philosophy finds a striking parallel in the Holographic Principle. Indra’s Net describes a cosmic web where each jewel reflects all other jewels, illustrating a holistic perspective where every element is inseparable from the entire network.34 This resonates deeply with the holographic principle, which suggests that the information content of a three-dimensional space can be encoded on a two-dimensional surface, implying that the whole is reflected in each part.35 In this holographic paradigm, the idea that information within a space is distributed across its boundaries mirrors the notion that each jewel in Indra’s Net reflects the entirety of the net.35 This convergence challenges traditional views of reality, urging contemplation of the universe as an intricately interconnected and interdependent system, and suggests that consciousness may play a key role in interpreting this coded interference pattern into our perceived reality.34

The non-dualistic concepts prevalent in Eastern philosophies, which assert the fundamental unity of existence and the illusion of separation, find echoes in quantum phenomena like quantum entanglement. Quantum entanglement demonstrates that particles remain connected regardless of distance, with the state of one instantly affecting the state of the other.8 This remarkable interconnectedness between distant objects resonates deeply with the Eastern notion of non-duality.14 Figures like Deepak Chopra articulate this convergence, stating that the “quantum experience is the interconnectivity of everything,” where apparent boundaries between individuals, objects, and cosmic phenomena are illusory, and there is “only one unified field expressing itself in infinite forms”.36 This perspective suggests that consciousness and reality are not two separate things but “one indivisible whole”.36

The work of Fritjof Capra in The Tao of Physics explicitly explores these parallels, arguing that the principles of modern physics, including relativity theory and quantum theory, resonate with the ancient knowledge found in Eastern mysticism, particularly Hinduism, Buddhism, and Taoism.38 Capra identified two core themes running through both domains: the fundamental interrelatedness and interdependence of all phenomena, and the intrinsically dynamic nature of reality.38 Werner Heisenberg, a founder of quantum mechanics, acknowledged these parallels and even noted that discussions about Indian philosophy helped him with his work, showing him that new ideas in quantum physics were not “crazy”.38 Niels Bohr, another quantum pioneer, similarly adopted the yin-yang symbol after visiting China.38

Emerging Theories of “Quantum Consciousness”

The persistent “hard problem” of consciousness, which traditional neuroscience struggles to fully explain, has led some scientists and thinkers to explore theories that integrate quantum mechanics with consciousness, suggesting that consciousness may be a more fundamental aspect of reality than merely an emergent property of the brain.

The Integrated Information Theory (IIT), proposed by Giulio Tononi, is one of the leading frameworks in the neuroscience of consciousness.41 IIT aims to explain consciousness by mathematically formalizing its relation to cause-effect power and existence, proposing that consciousness is integrated information.41 It suggests that the quantity of consciousness corresponds to the amount of integrated information generated by a complex of elements, and the quality of experience is specified by the set of informational relationships within that complex.42 A radical postulate of IIT is the “principle of true existence,” which asserts that “only phenomenal existence is true existence,” implying that non-conscious physical objects like “bodies and organs, tables and rocks… do not truly exist” in an absolute sense, but only relatively.41 IIT aims to be a “universal” theory, capable of determining whether any dynamical system, biological or non-biological, is conscious.43

Another prominent theory is Orchestrated Objective Reduction (Orch OR), developed by British physicist Sir Roger Penrose and anesthesiologist Stuart Hameroff.44 This controversial theory proposes that consciousness arises from quantum computations occurring in protein polymers called microtubules inside brain neurons.44 Penrose suggested “objective reduction” (OR) – a self-collapse of quantum superposition due to spacetime geometry – as a solution to both the quantum measurement problem and the hard problem of conscious experience.44 Hameroff posits that the brain functions more like a “multi-scalar vibrational resonance system” or a “quantum orchestra” rather than a classical computer, and that conscious experience (qualia) may be fundamental features of the universe.45

Other theories, such as those involving the Zero-Point Field (ZPF), suggest that the ZPF is an inherently sentient field and is key to understanding consciousness, with phenomenal states arising through resonant amplification of its modes.46

Contemporary figures like Deepak Chopra, Gregg Braden, Nassim Haramein, and Bruce Lipton actively bridge science and spirituality, advocating for the concept of Oneness as the true nature of reality.47 They propose that consciousness is not merely a product of the brain but a fundamental field that structures reality itself.49 This perspective suggests that the individual and the universe are not separate entities but expressions of an interconnected quantum field.50

A striking convergence is the idea that reality, at its deepest level, is fundamentally informational or energetic, rather than purely material. Modern physics increasingly points to information as primary, echoing ancient wisdom that describes reality as a projection of consciousness or an energetic “dance.” For instance, quantum mechanics reveals that “everything is energy” and can be understood as “information/intelligence/consciousness itself”.8 The holographic principle posits that the universe is fundamentally made of “information” in the form of qubits.17 The simulation hypothesis directly proposes reality as a “computer-generated simulation,” an “informational construct”.21 This scientific shift towards information as foundational strongly resonates with Hindu Maya as a “projection of Brahman” 19 and the Buddhist concept of phenomena as “mere conceptual constructs” or “illusory” 23, all implying a non-material, information-like basis for perceived reality. If everything is information/energy, and information is inherently dynamic and relational, then the perceived solidity and separateness of objects is secondary to their underlying informational nature. This directly mirrors the Buddhist concept of emptiness as constant becoming and dependent origination, and Hindu Māyā as a projection, rather than absolute non-existence.

Both modern physics and ancient wisdom independently arrive at the conclusion that the universe is fundamentally interconnected, challenging the intuitive perception of separate, isolated entities. Quantum entanglement, where particles are linked “instantaneously” regardless of distance 8, and quantum coherence, where particles “maintain a unified state” 14, demonstrate this interconnectedness. The holographic principle’s connection to Indra’s Net further highlights this shared understanding, where each part reflects the whole.34 This pervasive theme suggests a deep, underlying unity to existence.

A core agreement is the rejection of a static, objectively fixed reality in favor of one that is dynamic, fluid, and impermanent. Quantum mechanics, with its wave-particle duality and probabilistic nature, reveals that the “foundations of the physical world weren’t physical at all” 8 and that “impermanence is also a fundamental feature of reality”.14 Eastern philosophies, with their emphasis on Anicca (impermanence) and constant becoming, define Śūnyatā as phenomena “empty of intrinsic existence and nature” and equated with “dependent origination,” meaning they are “impermanent collections of causes and conditions”.23 This consistent emphasis on flux and change undermines the idea of a stable, objective external world.

While the scientific “observer effect” is distinct from conscious influence, the broader philosophical implications of quantum mechanics, combined with ancient wisdom, suggest consciousness is not merely an emergent property of the brain but may play a more fundamental, even constitutive, role in shaping or perceiving reality. The “hard problem” of consciousness remains unsolved by traditional neuroscience.7 If consciousness isn’t just an emergent property of the brain, then it must be fundamental. Quantum mechanics offers a framework for non-local, interconnected phenomena, making it a natural, albeit speculative, candidate for bridging this gap. The willingness of the scientific community to explore such radical ideas indicates a shift in scientific thought, moving closer to ancient wisdom’s premise of consciousness as primary. This is exemplified by theories of “quantum consciousness” 50 which propose that “conscious awareness may involve non-local interactions” and that the “individual and the universe may not be separate entities, but expressions of an interconnected quantum field—a view long held by mystical traditions”.50

Table 2: Parallels: Modern Physics & Ancient Wisdom on Reality’s Illusion

VI. Implications of an Illusory Reality: Living in the Dream

The convergence of modern physics and ancient wisdom on the illusory nature of reality carries profound implications for our understanding of existence, free will, morality, and human perception. If reality is indeed a dream or a projection, it necessitates a re-evaluation of many deeply held assumptions.

Re-evaluating Free Will

The concept of an illusory reality, whether arising from physics (such as determinism in classical physics, or the deterministic evolution of quantum states before measurement, or the programmed nature of a simulation) or ancient wisdom (like karma or dependent origination), profoundly challenges the conventional understanding of free will. If all events, including human choices, are the result of prior causes, then the feeling of “free will” might be an illusion.54 Hard incompatibilism, for instance, argues that free will cannot exist regardless of whether the world is deterministic or not.54 John Locke even questioned the very meaning of the phrase “free will,” suggesting it made no sense.54

If reality is a projection or a simulation, the “choices” individuals make might be part of the program or the dream’s unfolding. The idea that “free will is an illusion” implies that while one might feel they have options, those options might never actually materialize, or choices are simply thoughts “popping up”.55 This perspective raises significant challenges for traditional notions of moral responsibility and culpability, particularly for theological frameworks that posit heaven and hell based on freely chosen actions.54 However, this does not necessarily negate agency within the illusion. The understanding that reality is a construct shaped by consciousness suggests that thoughts, intentions, and perceptions play a crucial role in determining the reality experienced.33 This implies that while ultimate causality might reside outside the individual, there is still a powerful capacity for shaping one’s experience within the “dream.” The complex interplay between determinism, illusion, and perceived agency is a critical implication, suggesting that human freedom might be constrained by the underlying “rules” of the illusion, leading to a more nuanced understanding of agency within a larger, non-dual framework.

The Meaning of Existence and Purpose

If reality is an illusion, the search for inherent, objective meaning within that illusion may become futile. The assertion that existence is illusory prompts a fundamental questioning of the solidity of perceived reality, leading to a contemplation of whether it is merely a construct of our senses, shaped by subjective interpretations and limited perspectives.56 In this context, purpose might shift from achieving fixed external goals to understanding one’s relationship to the illusion itself.

Some perspectives suggest that “everything that isn’t ‘nothing’ is an illusion,” and that the individual is the “nothing that’s experiencing ‘everything'”—the pure awareness of the experience.52 This view indicates that if objective reality is an illusion, meaning is not found in the illusion, but through or as the conscious experience of it, or by realizing the underlying unity of all experience.52 This suggests that if the world is not ultimately real, then the goals and attachments within it might also be less significant. This liberates one to seek meaning in the underlying awareness or the process of realizing the illusory nature, aligning with spiritual paths focused on liberation or enlightenment. The meaning of existence, therefore, transforms from a quest for external validation to an internal journey of self-discovery and conscious engagement with the unfolding dream.

Moral and Ethical Considerations

The illusory nature of reality, particularly if it implies a lack of objective, fixed truths or a pre-determined framework, complicates traditional ethical systems. If reality is a simulation, questions arise regarding the ethical responsibilities of hypothetical creators and how moral principles would apply within such an artificial framework.22

Furthermore, human perception is subject to “moral illusions”—persistent, species-typical tendencies toward error that can trick our moral sense, much like optical illusions trick our sight.57 Examples include the self-serving bias, which distorts information to serve self-interest, and the in-group bias, which causes unfair discrimination.57 The “Just World Hypothesis,” a moral illusion, leads people to believe victims deserve their misfortune, reinforcing a false sense of security.57 These biases suggest that our moral compass is not always objective, further eroding the idea of a fixed, external moral reality.

Moreover, moral decision-making can be undermined by profound uncertainty about long-term consequences, leading to “cluelessness” about an action’s ultimate impact.58 If the ripple effects of actions are unknowable, ethical theories based on maximizing positive outcomes become practically useless.58 This implies a shift towards internal cultivation and ethical principles that transcend the specific “rules” of the illusion. This pushes towards an ethics rooted in intention, compassion, or the cultivation of conscious awareness within the “dream,” rather than a rigid set of external rules.

Impact on Human Perception and Transformative Understanding

The understanding that reality is an illusory construct, rather than leading to nihilism, can be profoundly empowering. It highlights that reality, as we perceive it, is largely “crafted by our brains” and that the brain does not distinguish between “real” and imagined experiences.33 This perspective, echoed by Plato’s Allegory of the Cave—where prisoners perceive shadows as reality, mistaking them for ultimate truth—suggests that enlightenment involves breaking free from these perceptual chains and ascending to a more profound truth.33

The observer effect, when interpreted broadly, implies that our thoughts, intentions, and perceptions play a crucial role in determining the reality we experience.33 This shifts agency from passive reception of a fixed reality to active co-creation within a fluid one. It suggests that “waking up” from the dream is not about escaping reality, but about transforming one’s

perception and interaction with it. By recognizing that reality is fluid and shaped by our thoughts, emotions, and actions, individuals can cultivate positive emotions, adopt empowering beliefs, and engage in intentional behavior to create a reality that aligns with their deepest desires.33 This is where ancient wisdom’s emphasis on inner transformation and mindfulness finds a powerful parallel in the implications of modern physics, fostering a transformative understanding of our capacity to influence our experienced world.

VII. Conclusion: Awakening to a Deeper Truth

The journey through modern physics and ancient wisdom reveals a compelling convergence on the notion that reality, as we typically perceive it, is far from a fixed, objective, and independent entity. Quantum mechanics dismantles the solidity of matter, revealing a probabilistic, interconnected, and observer-influenced substratum. The holographic principle offers a theoretical framework for a universe projected from a lower-dimensional informational surface. The simulation hypothesis provides a contemporary, computational lens through which to view reality as an artificial construct.

These scientific revelations find profound echoes in ancient wisdom traditions. Buddhism’s concept of Śūnyatā (emptiness) asserts that all phenomena lack intrinsic existence and are dependently originated, akin to illusions or dreams. Hinduism’s Māyā describes reality as a projection of the ultimate consciousness, Brahman, a cosmic dance that is real in its appearance but not ultimately independent. Western esoteric traditions, such as Gnosticism and Neoplatonism, portray the material world as a degraded or illusory manifestation of a higher divine realm, emphasizing the need for gnosis to transcend its limitations.

The agreement across these disparate domains is not merely metaphorical; it points to a shared understanding that reality is fundamentally informational, dynamic, and interconnected. It suggests that consciousness, far from being a mere byproduct of the brain, may play a more fundamental role in the manifestation or perception of this reality.

The implications of living in such a “dream” are transformative. It challenges conventional notions of free will, prompting a re-evaluation of agency and moral responsibility within a potentially pre-determined or constructed framework. The meaning of existence shifts from finding external purpose to discovering purpose through conscious engagement with the dream, or by realizing the underlying unity of awareness. Ethical considerations become more nuanced, moving beyond fixed rules to principles rooted in compassion and conscious understanding. Ultimately, recognizing reality as an illusion can be profoundly empowering, highlighting humanity’s capacity to shape its experienced world through intention and perception.

This convergence of scientific inquiry and ancient spiritual insight invites a profound shift in perspective: the “dream” of reality is not a prison, but a canvas. By understanding its illusory nature, humanity can move from passive perception to active, conscious participation, fostering a deeper, more integrated, and potentially more meaningful existence.

Works cited

1. Consciousness: Its Neurobiology and the Major Classes of Impairment – PMC, accessed August 1, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3222861/
2. Cognitive Science: An Introduction/What Consciousness Is – Wikibooks, open books for an open world, accessed August 1, 2025, https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cognitive_Science:_An_Introduction/What_Consciousness_Is
3. Consciousness in Psychology – Verywell Mind, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-consciousness-2795922
4. Consciousness | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed August 1, 2025, https://iep.utm.edu/consciousness/
5. en.wikipedia.org, accessed August 1, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consciousness#:~:text=Philosophers%20have%20used%20the%20term,is%20poised%20to%20do%20so).
6. Consciousness – Wikipedia, accessed August 1, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consciousness
7. Global workspace theory – Wikipedia, accessed August 1, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_workspace_theory
8. The Scientific Proof That Everything is Energy and Reality Isn’t Real – Esalq, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.esalq.usp.br/lepse/imgs/conteudo_thumb/The-Illusion-of-Reality—The-Scientific-Proof-That-Everything-is-Energy-and-Reality-Isnt-Real.pdf
9. Quantum Mechanics and Reality, by Thomas J McFarlane – Integral Science, accessed August 1, 2025, http://www.integralscience.org/sacredscience/SS_quantum.html
10. The Quantum Measurement Problem: A Review of Recent Trends – arXiv, accessed August 1, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2502.19278v2
11. Observer (quantum physics) – Wikipedia, accessed August 1, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Observer_(quantum_physics)
12. Observer effect (physics) – Wikipedia, accessed August 1, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Observer_effect_(physics)
13. Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics – Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed August 1, 2025, https://iep.utm.edu/int-qm/
14. Quantum Physics and Buddhism: Exploring the Parallels Between Science and Spirituality | by Andre Tyrone II | Medium, accessed August 1, 2025, https://medium.com/@spacehren1/this-is-my-essay-about-the-thing-that-always-confused-but-fascinated-me-ever-since-i-started-7906b681060a
15. The illusory Universe | plus.maths.org, accessed August 1, 2025, https://plus.maths.org/content/illusory-universe
16. Quantum gravity in the can: The holographic principle | plus.maths.org, accessed August 1, 2025, https://plus.maths.org/content/quantum-gravity-can-holographic-principle
17. The universe is a hologram and other mind-blowing theories in theoretical physics | BrandeisNOW, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.brandeis.edu/now/2018/march/hologram-qubits-headrick.html
18. Is God’s gorgeous universe a hologram? 2-8-19 (Bill’s Faith Matters blog) – TypePad, accessed August 1, 2025, https://billtammeus.typepad.com/my_weblog/2019/02/2-8-19.html
19. Holographic Principle and Advaita Vedanta – Hinduwebsite.com, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.hinduwebsite.com/hinduism/essays/advaita-holographic-principle.asp
20. Maya is misunderstood as illusion. : r/AdvaitaVedanta – Reddit, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/AdvaitaVedanta/comments/1ix7nes/maya_is_misunderstood_as_illusion/
21. Simulation hypothesis – Wikipedia, accessed August 1, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simulation_hypothesis
22. Perspectives on Reality: Implications of Living in a Simulation | by Soulthreader | Medium, accessed August 1, 2025, https://medium.com/@nicjames0515/perspectives-on-reality-implications-of-living-in-a-simulation-180cd8e78fb3
23. Śūnyatā – Wikipedia, accessed August 1, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C5%9A%C5%ABnyat%C4%81
24. Does Buddhism Deny Reality? Addressing Misconceptions About …, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQ1BWIhvhX4
25. Help me understand Maya and Brahman. : r/AdvaitaVedanta – Reddit, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/AdvaitaVedanta/comments/10qzcbt/help_me_understand_maya_and_brahman/
26. (PDF) Western Esotericism – ResearchGate, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380574001_Western_Esotericism
27. Neoplatonism – Wikipedia, accessed August 1, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoplatonism
28. Plotinus’ Neoplatonism: The Ultimate Unity of Mind and Body – Philosophy Institute, accessed August 1, 2025, https://philosophy.institute/philosophy-of-mind/neoplatonism-unity-mind-body/
29. The concept of the One and emanation | History of Ancient Philosophy Class Notes | Fiveable, accessed August 1, 2025, https://library.fiveable.me/history-ancient-philosophy/unit-13/concept-emanation/study-guide/qG65moyQQZxFF0NP
30. Neoplatonism is overly world-denying! – Reddit, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/Neoplatonism/comments/1ipe90t/neoplatonism_is_overly_worlddenying/
31. Eastern Mysticism and Quantum Physics: Dancing to the Same Cosmic Tune, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.consciouschronicles.com/post/eastern-mysticism-and-quantum-physics-dancing-to-the-same-cosmic-tune
32. Quantum Physics and Emptiness: Parallels Between Buddhism and Science – YouTube, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DrCFSbOZ1bs
33. The Illusory Perception of Reality: Exploring Quantum Mechanics, Energy, and Human Beliefs | Steve Zafeiriou, accessed August 1, 2025, https://stevezafeiriou.com/illusory-perception-of-reality/
34. New Evidence for Holographic Universe Backs-up Ancient Philosophy – The Sociable, accessed August 1, 2025, https://sociable.co/technology/holographic-universe-ancient-philosophy/
35. ~Indra’s Net & The Holographic Brain~ | by ~~~Shapeshifter32~~~ | Medium, accessed August 1, 2025, https://medium.com/@apeironkosmos/indras-net-and-the-holographic-principle-are-intriguing-concepts-that-offer-profound-insights-into-ad979e81b82b
36. The Basic Tenets of Quantum Consciousness – YouTube, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1P0ZRqJLRTI
37. How to Navigate Your Quantum Mind for a Better Life | Deepak Chopra – YouTube, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A2wNKtcYRvk
38. The Tao of Physics – Wikipedia, accessed August 1, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tao_of_Physics
39. www.blinkist.com, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.blinkist.com/en/books/the-tao-of-physics-en#:~:text=The%20Tao%20of%20Physics%20(1975,and%20Taoism%20on%20the%20other.
40. The Tao of Physics Book Summary by Fritjof Capra – Shortform, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.shortform.com/summary/the-tao-of-physics-summary-fritjof-capra
41. How to be an integrated information theorist without … – Frontiers, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/computational-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fncom.2024.1510066/full
42. Consciousness as Integrated Information: a Provisional Manifesto | The Biological Bulletin: Vol 215, No 3 – The University of Chicago Press: Journals, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.2307/25470707
43. Toward a universal theory of consciousness – Oxford Academic, accessed August 1, 2025, https://academic.oup.com/nc/article/2024/1/niae022/7685886
44. Orch OR – Stuart Hameroff, MD, accessed August 1, 2025, https://hameroff.arizona.edu/research-overview/orch-or
45. Is your brain really a computer, or is it a quantum orchestra tuned to the universe? – Interalia Magazine, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.interaliamag.org/articles/stuart-hameroff-is-your-brain-really-a-computer-or-is-it-a-quantum-orchestra-tuned-to-the-universe/
46. Laying the foundations for a theory of consciousness: the significance of critical brain dynamics for the formation of conscious states – Frontiers, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/human-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2024.1379191/full
47. Science & Nature: Bridging the Gap Between Consciousness and the Earth – Humanity’s Team, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.humanitysteam.org/category/science-nature-blog
48. “The Science of Oneness” with Gregg Braden, Bruce H. Lipton, Nassim Haramein, and Lynne McTaggart | Humanity’s Team Podcast with Steve Farrell Podcast – Everand, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.everand.com/podcast/506004367/The-Science-of-Oneness-with-Gregg-Braden-Bruce-H-Lipton-Nassim-Haramein-and-Lynne-McTaggart-Our-esteemed-guests-for-this-podcast-The-Science
49. The I Ching: Ancient Wisdom Through the Lens of Quantum Consciousness – Medium, accessed August 1, 2025, https://medium.com/@yogsbags/the-i-ching-ancient-wisdom-through-the-lens-of-quantum-consciousness-0939d059071e
50. Quantum Consciousness: Bridging Science, Soul, and Self-Integration at The Science of Consciousness Conference in Barcelona – World Happiness Foundation, accessed August 1, 2025, https://worldhappiness.foundation/blog/consciousness/quantum-consciousness-bridging-science-soul-and-self-integration-at-the-science-of-consciousness-conference-in-barcelona/
51. Nonduality and Quantum physics – Reddit, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/nonduality/comments/1eervit/nonduality_and_quantum_physics/
52. Reality is an illusion, nothing exists. : r/awakened – Reddit, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/awakened/comments/1fet8jw/reality_is_an_illusion_nothing_exists/
53. Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view – PMC – PubMed Central, accessed August 1, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4802748/
54. Free will – Wikipedia, accessed August 1, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_will
55. “Free will is an illusion”, what does it mean? : r/freewill – Reddit, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/freewill/comments/16te4ds/free_will_is_an_illusion_what_does_it_mean/
56. elevatesociety.com, accessed August 1, 2025, https://elevatesociety.com/existence-is-illusory-and-it/#:~:text=Firstly%2C%20the%20assertion%20that%20existence,subjective%20interpretations%20and%20limited%20perspectives.
57. Moral Illusions Explained – Ethics Unwrapped, accessed August 1, 2025, https://ethicsunwrapped.utexas.edu/video/moral-illusions-explained
58. The Moral Illusion: What Happens When We Realize Ethics Was Never Real? — EA Forum, accessed August 1, 2025, https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/KnuB7Q6p6GvRpw82P/the-moral-illusion-what-happens-when-we-realize-ethics-was