Introduction: The Enduring Quest for Reality

Humanity has perpetually grappled with the fundamental nature of reality, an enduring quest that spans millennia. From ancient philosophers contemplating the essence of being to modern physicists probing the very fabric of spacetime, the inquiry into what truly exists, how it is perceived, and the meaning derived from it remains central to human understanding.1 This profound deconstruction of existence moves beyond simplistic definitions, embracing a multi-faceted understanding that acknowledges the inherent limits of knowledge and the boundaries of what can be definitively explained about the world and ourselves.2 The continuous pursuit of ontological certainty—the desire to firmly grasp what exists—is a deep-seated human drive. However, this drive constantly confronts inherent epistemological barriers, as the very act of seeking knowledge often deconstructs previous certainties. This process leads to a more nuanced, albeit less definitive, understanding of reality, framing the quest as an ongoing inquiry rather than a solvable problem.

This report embarks on an interdisciplinary exploration, weaving together insights from cosmology, quantum physics, various branches of philosophy (including metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, and existentialism), psychology, and the imaginative narratives of science fiction.2 Each discipline offers a unique lens through which to examine the concept of reality, revealing its objective, subjective, and intersubjective dimensions. This holistic approach is essential for a comprehensive deconstruction of existence.

Science fiction, as a genre of speculative fiction, serves as a powerful laboratory for “thought experiments,” allowing for the exploration of hypothetical realities and their profound implications for human existence, identity, and consciousness.5 Simultaneously, self-reflection and introspection offer a personal pathway to understanding how individual minds construct and interact with reality, influencing one’s sense of meaning and well-being.8 These two complementary lenses are crucial in dissecting the complex layers of existence, providing both grand cosmic perspectives and intimate personal insights.

Part I: Philosophical Foundations of Reality

This section establishes the groundwork for understanding reality by defining its fundamental philosophical distinctions, tracing historical perspectives, and examining the profound role of perception in shaping the experienced world.

Objective, Subjective, and Intersubjective Realities: Distinguishing Core Philosophical Definitions and Their Complexities

Understanding reality necessitates distinguishing between its objective, subjective, and intersubjective dimensions. Each offers a unique perspective on what constitutes “real.”

Objective Reality refers to that which is true or exists independently of any minds, perceptions, or biases.11 Scientific realism, for instance, posits that the world described by science exists objectively, independent of human perception or belief.1 Examples often cited include mathematical statements like “2 + 2 = 4” 11 or the actual number of apples on a plate.12 However, a significant challenge arises from the human mind’s inherent subjectivity, which complicates direct access or confirmation of a purely objective reality without mental processing.12

Subjective Reality is dependent on individual minds, encompassing biases, perceptions, emotions, opinions, imaginary objects, and conscious experiences.11 A claim is considered subjectively true if it holds exclusively from the viewpoint of a sentient being.11 For example, one person may find the weather pleasantly warm, while another finds the same weather too hot; both views are subjective.11 Individual subjective reality is uniquely shaped by personal experiences, beliefs, emotions, and cognitive processes, acting as intricate psychological and perceptual filters.16 This includes unique individual experiences such as qualia—the private, qualitative experience of taste or color.12

Intersubjective Reality bridges the gap between pure subjectivity and pure objectivity. It refers to the “process and product of sharing experiences, knowledge, understandings, and expectations with others”.17 This concept is a key feature of social constructionism, where the existence, nature, and meaning of things are not entirely individual but are subject to social and linguistic constraints within a culture or subculture.17 A degree of consensus is necessary for communication and shared understanding within a group.17 Intersubjectivity counters both the undiluted subjectivism of extreme philosophical idealism and the pure objectivism of naive realism, suggesting that shared constraints filter human apprehension of the world.17

While often regarded as opposites, philosophy explores a spectrum between subjectivity and objectivity, acknowledging a “gray area in-between”.11 The complexity arises in distinguishing between knowledge, opinions, and subjective knowledge.11 What humans often perceive as objective reality frequently appears to be a form of “collective subjectivity” or “perceptual consensus”.12 Nevertheless, true objective reality is posited to exist independently of perception, even if human access to it is always mediated and refracted through subjective and imperfect minds.18

The human experience of reality reveals a profound paradox: while objective reality is defined as mind-independent, human beings, with their inherently subjective minds, can only ever experience or process this objective reality through their own unique filters.12 This means that what is commonly labeled “objective truth” at a human level is not a direct, unmediated apprehension of a mind-independent reality, but rather a highly robust form of intersubjective agreement or perceptual consensus. The inherent difficulty in providing a purely objective example 15 stems from this fundamental epistemological limitation. Consequently, human knowledge, including scientific knowledge, is always, to some extent, a social construct built upon shared subjective experiences, making the “truth” operated with fundamentally intersubjective.

Furthermore, if human “objective reality” is largely a “perceptual consensus,” the question then arises as to whose perceptions form this consensus. The evidence suggests that this process is not democratic, but rather aristocratic, where a small number of individuals exert significant determining power.18 This implies that the construction of intersubjective reality, which subsequently appears objective, is influenced by intellectual authority (e.g., figures like Aristotle or Galileo) and underlying power dynamics, rather than a simple majority vote. This has profound implications for how knowledge is validated and disseminated, suggesting that “truth” is not merely discovered but also negotiated and enforced by influential figures or institutions. This raises critical questions about potential biases and the historical contingency of accepted “facts.”

The following table summarizes these distinctions:

Category	Definition/Nature	Key Characteristics	Examples	Philosophical Roots/Key Thinkers
Objective Reality	Exists independently of any mind.	Universal facts, verifiable independently.	Laws of physics, Mathematical truths (2+2=4), A meteor crashing into a car (even if unobserved).	Platonic Idealism (metaphysical objectivism), Scientific Realism
Subjective Reality	Dependent on individual minds.	Personal experiences, emotions, opinions, qualia.	Perception of beauty, The taste of cake, Hallucinations.	George Berkeley (empirical idealism), Descartes (individual consciousness)
Intersubjective Reality	Shared understandings/consensus among minds.	Socially constructed meanings, cultural norms, language.	Scientific theories (as consensus), Cultural identity, Justice within a society.	Social Constructionism, Symbolic Interactionism

Historical Perspectives on Reality: From Plato’s Forms to Modern Idealism and Solipsism

Philosophical thought has long explored the relationship between mind and reality, giving rise to diverse perspectives.

Platonic Idealism, a foundational philosophy in the Western tradition, posits that true reality resides in a higher, eternal realm of abstract Forms or Ideas, independent of individual minds.11 Plato considered geometry and ethics to be objective enterprises concerned with universal truth, arguing for impartial standards of truth and correctness.11 For Plato, the physical world is merely an “imperfect reflection” or “shadow” of this true, unchanging reality, while opinions belong to a “shifting sphere of sensibilities”.11

In stark contrast, Empirical Idealism, exemplified by George Berkeley, holds that “things only exist as they are perceived”.11 This metaphysical view asserts that “the only reality is the ideal world” of ideas, with “no external reality composed of matter and energy”.20 Berkeley famously argued that only an “infinite being” (God) could produce and direct the perceptions humans have of physical matter, thereby ensuring the continuity of perceived reality even when not directly observed by human minds.20 While sometimes categorized as a form of anti-realism, idealists like Berkeley do not necessarily reject the existence of an objective reality, but rather affirm that this real natural world is fundamentally mental.22

Transcendental Idealism, developed by Immanuel Kant, transformed idealism by arguing that human knowledge of reality is “completely based on mental structures”.22 This means the human mind plays an active, constitutive role in shaping the experience of reality.3 For Kant, humans can only know phenomena—appearances as they are processed by the mind—but not noumena, or “things-in-themselves,” which exist independently of human perception.

An extreme philosophical position, Solipsism, asserts that “only one’s own mind is sure to exist”.23 As an epistemological stance, solipsism maintains that knowledge of anything outside one’s own mind is uncertain, implying that the external world and other minds might not exist independently of one’s own consciousness.23

Within solipsism, Metaphysical Solipsism is a variety based on subjective idealism, maintaining that the self is the sole existing reality, and all other realities, including the external world and other persons, are mere representations of that self, lacking independent existence.24

Epistemological Solipsism views the existence of an external world as an “unresolvable question” rather than definitively false.24 It questions the extent to which the external world exists independently, suggesting that a God-like being might control sensations, making an external world appear real when most of it is not.24 Finally,

Methodological Solipsism is an agnostic approach, often used as a thought experiment, emphasizing that justifications for an external world must be founded on undeniable facts about one’s own consciousness.24 René Descartes’ famous

cogito ergo sum (“I think; therefore I exist”) is a foundational idea here, establishing certainty only about one’s own thinking self.23

This historical progression, from Plato’s objective idealism where ideas exist independently of individual minds 11, to Berkeley’s empirical idealism where existence is contingent on perception 11, and finally to solipsism where only one’s own mind is certain to exist 23, reveals a profound spectrum of philosophical thought regarding the mind’s role in reality. This progression highlights the ongoing philosophical struggle to reconcile the apparent external world with undeniable internal experience. It demonstrates that “mind” in philosophical discourse is not a monolithic concept but can refer to universal reason, divine consciousness, or individual subjectivity, each with distinct and far-reaching implications for what constitutes “reality.” This deconstruction shows that the question “What is reality?” is deeply intertwined with “What is mind?” and “Whose mind?”

While solipsism presents a compelling philosophical thought experiment, its radical implications for daily life are highlighted by critics who argue that if it were true, “daily actions such as voting, paying taxes, or planting and reaping a harvest would be merely products of people’s imaginations”.23 This observation reveals a crucial societal and ethical dimension: a functional human society, with its shared responsibilities, moral frameworks, and collective endeavors, implicitly or explicitly must reject metaphysical solipsism. The “problem of other minds” 24 transitions from a purely epistemological puzzle to a foundational challenge to empathy, cooperation, and the very possibility of a shared human experience. This suggests that even if metaphysical solipsism cannot be definitively disproven, its practical consequences compel humanity to operate under an assumption of shared, intersubjective reality for the sake of social cohesion and moral action.

The Mind’s Eye: Perception and the Construction of Reality

Human perception is not a passive reception of objective reality but an active, dynamic process.16 It is described as a “dynamic conflict between the attempts of an outer world to impose an actuality on us and our efforts to transform this actuality into a self-centered perspective”.19 This involves a “confrontation between an inward-directed vector of external reality compelling awareness and an outward-directed vector of physiological, cultural, and psychological transformation”.19

Our sensory organs receive information from the environment, which is then processed and interpreted by the brain to create our perception of reality.16 This process is not purely objective; prior experiences, expectations, cognitive biases, and the immediate context significantly influence how sensory input is interpreted.16 For example, two individuals witnessing the same event may perceive it differently based on their subjective reality.16 The brain actively reduces and organizes the multitude of amorphous perceptibles into coherent perceptions.19

The psychophysical process of perception involves several stages. External “determinables” generate stimuli that strike our sensory receptors. These stimuli are then altered and interpreted electrically by the body’s neurological system, becoming “perceptibles” in the brain.19 What is received as a perceptible may differ from the original stimulus due to external medium alterations or limitations of our sensory receptors. These perceptibles then pass through a “cultural matrix,” which includes a “cultural schema” (e.g., innate categories like cause and effect, space, and time) and a “cultural system of meanings-values”.19 This matrix imbues perceptibles with significance, transforming them into “percepts”—what is consciously apprehended.19

This biocultural perceptual determinism is further complicated by active psychological engagement. Elements such as neuroses, anxieties, motivations, and memories play a role.19 The existence of perceptual illusions or hallucinations demonstrates that individuals can perceive things that do not exist externally or are grossly distorted.19 This implies that perceptibles are neither sufficient nor necessary for perception; individuals can project visions or ignore stimuli.19 Ultimately, perception is an active, psychological engagement—a “clash of two worlds whose battle lines comprise our perception”.19

Perceptual realism is the common-sense view that objects exist independently of perceivers.25 Direct realists claim that humans directly engage with these objects. Naïve direct realism holds that objects retain all perceived properties (e.g., yellowness, warmth) when unperceived. Scientific direct realism, however, distinguishes between primary qualities (e.g., shape, size, mass, which are independent of the perceiver) and secondary qualities (e.g., color, smell, which are dependent on the perceiver), suggesting that some properties are perceiver-dependent.25 The active, transformative nature of perception challenges the simplicity of direct realism.

The detailed breakdown of perception reveals that even when attempting to grasp objective reality through the senses, the process is inherently and profoundly subjective. From stimuli being filtered physiologically to perceptibles being transformed by a “cultural matrix” into “percepts,” every step involves an active, internal construction. This means that the “objective” world humans interact with is always already a transformed version, mediated by biological, psychological, and cultural frameworks. This reinforces the idea that true, unmediated “objective reality” is fundamentally inaccessible to human consciousness, and what is called “objective” is, in practice, a highly refined and culturally validated intersubjective consensus. This implies a significant limitation on the ability to ever fully know “reality as it is” independently of human minds.

The “cultural matrix,” comprising schema and meanings-values, serves as a critical filter that transforms raw perceptibles into meaningful percepts.19 This is not a static process; cultural norms, beliefs, and values evolve over time.16 As cultures change, so too do the frameworks through which individuals perceive and interpret the world. This suggests a dynamic and causal feedback loop: collective perceptions and interpretations shape the cultural matrix, and this matrix, in turn, shapes how future generations perceive reality. This implies that “reality” itself, at least in its human-experienced form, is not just discovered but is continuously co-constructed and deconstructed through an ongoing interplay between individual minds and their cultural environments, influencing everything from scientific paradigms to social norms.

Part II: The Multiverse: Scientific Frontiers of Existence

This section explores modern scientific theories that posit the existence of multiple universes, challenging the traditional view of a single, self-contained reality.

Cosmic Inflation and the Birth of Bubble Universes

Inflationary cosmology is a theory suggesting that for a few nanoseconds after the Big Bang, the universe underwent an “exceedingly quick” and “stupendously quick” exponential expansion, repeatedly doubling in size.26 This rapid expansion, or “inflation,” may represent the “natural state of the universe”.27

This theory provides a compelling mechanism for generating a multiverse.26 During this inflationary period, quantum fluctuations cause different regions to expand at varying rates.28 These fluctuations lead to the formation of separate, self-contained “bubble universes,” each potentially possessing distinct physical properties, including different laws of physics and fundamental constants.27

A key variant, eternal inflation, posits that the inflationary phase never completely ends in all regions. While some regions stop inflating and form distinct bubble universes, other regions continue to inflate indefinitely.28 This process, driven by a scalar field called the inflaton, could lead to the formation of an infinite number of bubble universes, each with unique physical properties determined by local conditions at the time of their formation.26

There is “very good evidence for inflation” from observations of the distribution of galaxies and the cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation.26 The more robust inflation theory proves, the higher the likelihood of the multiverse’s existence.26 This concept profoundly challenges the notion of a unique, finely-tuned universe and offers a potential solution to the apparent “fine-tuning” of our universe’s physical constants for life.26 In an eternal inflation multiverse, where “every possibility happens,” the existence of a universe like ours, with conditions suitable for life, becomes statistically inevitable rather than a singular cosmic accident.26

The concept of eternal inflation fundamentally shifts the cosmological paradigm from a singular, unique universe to an infinite number of universes.26 This has a profound implication for how the “fine-tuning” of our universe, where physical constants appear perfectly calibrated for life, is understood.26 Instead of requiring a specific, perhaps teleological, explanation for why our universe is life-supporting, the multiverse provides a statistical answer: our universe is simply one of the many that happened to have the right conditions, making human existence “inevitable” within the vast ensemble.26 This moves the scientific inquiry from seeking a unique cause to understanding the probabilistic distribution of properties across an infinite landscape, fundamentally altering the nature of questions about cosmic origins and purpose.

String Theory and the Landscape of Possibilities

String theory is a theoretical framework in physics that replaces point-like particles with one-dimensional “strings.” The vibrational states of these strings determine the properties (such as mass and charge) of the particles they represent.30 It is a leading candidate for a “theory of everything,” aiming to unify all fundamental forces (gravity, electromagnetism, strong, and weak) and forms of matter within a single quantum mechanical framework.30

The theory has evolved from earlier bosonic string theory into superstring theory, which posits supersymmetry. In the mid-1990s, it was conjectured that five consistent versions of superstring theory were all different limiting cases of a single, eleven-dimensional theory known as M-theory.30

A significant implication and challenge of string theory is that it describes an “enormous landscape of possible universes,” estimated to be around 10^500^.30 This vast number of solutions suggests that these universes could be diverse enough to accommodate almost any phenomenon observed at low energies.30

This “vast number of solutions” is considered a “virtue” by some physicists, as it might offer a natural anthropic explanation for the observed values of physical constants, particularly the small cosmological constant.28 The anthropic principle suggests that our universe’s properties must be compatible with the existence of conscious observers.28 In this view, the observation of a small cosmological constant is a “tautological consequence” of the requirement for life to exist, as humans would only arise and observe a universe that allows for intelligent life.30

String theory’s prediction of a “landscape of 10^500^ possible universes” 30 presents a unique epistemological challenge. While offering a potential “theory of everything” 30, this sheer abundance of possibilities makes “precise predictions difficult” 28 and raises concerns about falsifiability. The reliance on the anthropic principle to explain observed fine-tuning 30 is criticized by some as an “excuse for failure” or “vacuous”.30 This implies a deeper challenge in scientific methodology: when a theory generates too many possible outcomes to be testable in a conventional sense, it risks moving from empirical science to philosophical speculation, challenging the very criteria for what constitutes a “scientific” explanation of reality. This highlights the limits of current scientific understanding when confronted with extreme complexity.

Quantum Mechanics and the Many-Worlds Interpretation

In quantum mechanics, the observer effect refers to the fact that the act of measuring or observing a quantum system inevitably alters its state.32 Particles like electrons do not occupy a definite position or momentum until they are observed.32 This implies that observation and measurement are not passive actions but actively shape the systems being studied, blurring the line between observer and observed.32

While the “observer effect” has been interpreted by some to suggest that a conscious mind directly affects reality 33, most physicists agree that “observation” in this context refers to interaction with a measuring device or the environment, not necessarily a conscious observer.32

Decoherence theory suggests that interactions with the environment cause the wave function to “collapse” by entangling the possible states of the particle with those of the environment.32 Richard Feynman famously stated, “Nature does not know what you are looking at, and she behaves the way she is going to behave whether you bother to take down the data or not”.33

The Many-Worlds Interpretation (MWI), proposed by Hugh Everett, asserts that the universal wavefunction is objectively real and rejects the concept of wave function collapse.34 Instead, all possible outcomes of quantum measurements are physically realized in different, non-interacting “worlds” or “branches” of the multiverse.34 The evolution of reality as a whole in MWI is rigidly deterministic and local.34 This interpretation views time as a “many-branched tree,” where every possible quantum outcome is realized.34

MWI aims to resolve quantum paradoxes such as Schrödinger’s Cat, Wigner’s Friend, and the EPR paradox by positing that all outcomes exist in parallel worlds, removing the need for an arbitrary collapse postulate.34 It treats all histories or worlds as equally real, with the universal wave function considered the fundamental physical entity.34 Some physicists argue that the many worlds of quantum mechanics (MWI) and the many worlds of eternal inflation are the same phenomenon, and that the multiverse is necessary to give exact operational meaning to probabilistic predictions from quantum mechanics.35

Despite its explanatory power, MWI faces criticism for being unfalsifiable due to the non-communicating nature of its parallel universes, making direct empirical evidence unlikely.29 Testing MWI would require placing macroscopic objects in a coherent superposition and interfering them, which is currently beyond experimental capability.34 Other ongoing puzzles include the “preferred basis problem” (how worlds separate) and the role of probability (Born rule) within a framework where all outcomes are realized.34

Both inflationary cosmology’s bubble universes 26 and MWI’s parallel worlds 34 propose realities that are “causally disconnected” or “non-communicating” from our own.28 This raises a critical epistemological challenge for science: how can the existence of something that, by its very definition, cannot be directly observed or interacted with, be verified? The reliance on “indirect evidence” 28 or the current untestability of MWI 34 pushes the boundaries of traditional scientific methodology, particularly falsifiability. This implies that the scientific pursuit of reality might increasingly venture into realms where “verification” needs to be redefined, perhaps relying more on theoretical consistency and explanatory power than direct empirical proof, thereby blurring the lines between science and philosophy.

The debate surrounding the “observer effect” in quantum mechanics 32 is not merely a technical one but carries profound metaphysical implications for the nature of reality. While the scientific consensus emphasizes environmental “interaction” over conscious “observation” as the cause of wave function collapse 32, the very existence of interpretations that do posit a central role for consciousness 1 highlights an ongoing philosophical tension. If consciousness were necessary for collapse, it would strongly support idealist views where reality is fundamentally mind-dependent. The scientific preference for an interaction-based explanation attempts to maintain a physicalist, mind-independent framework for reality. This unresolved debate at the quantum level demonstrates that even the most fundamental scientific discoveries continue to force a re-evaluation of core philosophical assumptions about the relationship between mind and matter, influencing the understanding of objective reality.

Scientific Debates and the Limits of Empirical Verification

Multiverse theories face significant criticisms and challenges within the scientific community. A primary concern is that many multiverse theories are considered “speculation or philosophy rather than verifiable science”.29 This criticism is particularly relevant for multiverse types that are more disconnected and thus harder to empirically test.31 The lack of empirical testability and falsifiability is a major concern for critics, with some physicists arguing that it is “not a traditional scientific theory”.29

The principle of Occam’s Razor, which favors the simplest explanation, is often invoked by critics who contend that postulating other universes represents “entities multiplied beyond necessity”.31 However, defenders of the multiverse counter that describing the observable universe as merely one part of a larger multiverse can be a simpler and more elegant explanation than attempting to explain our universe as the sole existing one.31

The legitimacy and utility of anthropic arguments, which explain phenomena like the universe’s fine-tuning by stating that humans exist in a universe compatible with life, are a significant area of debate.28 Critics highlight the difficulty in precisely defining “life” or calculating probabilities across different universes.31 There is also a risk of accepting anthropic explanations for phenomena that could be more effectively and elegantly explained by other scientific reasoning.31 Some prominent theorists disagree with using anthropic reasoning as an “excuse for failure”.30

A crucial point of contention is that in true multiverse theories, the universes are often “completely disjoint” and “nothing that happens in any one of them is causally linked to what happens in any other one”.29 This lack of causal connection is seen by critics as placing such multiverses “beyond any scientific support”.29

The ambition to fully explain reality through science faces fundamental limitations.2 These limits can be categorized:

Provisional Limits refer to currently unknown scientific truths that are expected to be discovered in the future.38

External Limits pertain to realities that do not belong to the domain of science and are beyond its reach, such as concepts of God, soul, ethics, or beauty.38 While scientific-materialistic worldviews may ignore these as non-real or purely mental constructs, for others, these concepts describe intriguing realities.38 Finally,

Internal Limits are boundaries discovered by science itself, referring to concepts within the domain of science but outside its reach. Examples include physical indeterminacy (from quantum mechanics) and mathematical incompleteness.38 Science is limited by its “form” and cannot offer a complete explanation of reality.39

The criticisms against multiverse theories—falsifiability, Occam’s Razor, and causal disconnection 29—highlight a critical, ongoing debate within the scientific community itself: what constitutes a “scientific” theory? When theoretical frameworks, like those for the multiverse, venture into realms that are inherently untestable by current or even conceivable empirical methods, they force a re-evaluation of the very definition of “science.” This pushes science to redefine “verification,” potentially relying more on theoretical consistency and explanatory power than direct empirical proof, thereby blurring the lines between science and philosophy.29

Part III: The Mind: Consciousness and Personal Reality

This section delves into the profound relationship between consciousness and personal reality, exploring the philosophical challenges of subjective experience and the role of self-reflection in shaping individual understanding.

The Hard Problem of Consciousness and Idealism

The Hard Problem of Consciousness refers to the challenge of explaining how physical processes in the brain give rise to subjective experience—the “what it is like” quality of conscious states.7 This is distinct from the “easy problems” of consciousness, which involve explaining cognitive functions like perception or memory.

Philosophical approaches to consciousness generally fall into two main camps: physicalist theories, which hold that the conscious mind or mental states are reducible to neural activity in the brain, and non-physicalist theories, which argue that consciousness is non-physical in some sense.40 There are also representational theories of consciousness, where conscious mental states are reduced to a representational relationship between mental states and the world.40

Idealism offers a distinct perspective, asserting that, most fundamentally, reality is equivalent to mind, spirit, or consciousness, or that reality itself is entirely a mental construct.20

Ontological idealism specifically posits that all of reality is in some way mental or ultimately grounded in a mental basis, suggesting that reality itself is non-physical, immaterial, or experiential at its core.22 In contrast,

epistemological idealism merely affirms that reality can only be known through ideas and mental structures, without necessarily making metaphysical claims about things-in-themselves.22 Some idealist views, such as cosmic idealism, propose that concrete reality is wholly grounded in a cosmic mentality, like the universe as a whole or a deity.22

A contemporary philosophical system, Analytic Idealism, developed by Dr. Bernardo Kastrup, posits consciousness as fundamental rather than emergent.41 Frameworks that position consciousness as fundamental offer profound resolutions to persistent paradoxes in quantum mechanics, including the measurement problem, quantum nonlocality, and Wigner’s Friend paradox.36 These frameworks suggest that consciousness continuously interacts with reality at all scales and actively participates in determining which quantum potentials become actual.37 This implies that reality is not fixed but rather a “web of interacting quantum perspectives, constantly shifting depending on the observer”.36

The Hard Problem of Consciousness poses a significant challenge to physicalism, leading some to propose consciousness as fundamental, rather than merely an emergent property of matter. This flips the traditional causal relationship, suggesting that consciousness actively shapes reality rather than merely observing it. This re-evaluation of existence implies that the universe might not be a collection of inert particles from which consciousness somehow arises, but rather that consciousness is the foundational element, and what is perceived as physical reality is a manifestation or structuring of this underlying consciousness.22

Furthermore, positioning consciousness as fundamental offers elegant and unifying solutions to long-standing quantum paradoxes, such as the measurement problem, quantum nonlocality, and Wigner’s Friend paradox.36 If consciousness is an active participant in determining reality, then the apparent “collapse” of a quantum wave function upon observation is not an arbitrary event but a direct result of consciousness-quantum interaction. Similarly, the instantaneous influence of entangled particles across vast distances (nonlocality) becomes natural if consciousness itself transcends spacetime limitations, operating as a non-local field that guides quantum probabilities. The Wigner’s Friend paradox, where different observers might record conflicting quantum states, dissolves if individual consciousness exists within a broader, universal consciousness field that ensures consistency and coherence across observations, aligning subjective experiences within a shared reality.36

Self-Reflection and the Construction of Personal Reality

Self-reflection, or introspection, is the foundation of self-awareness and is crucial for personal growth, inner work, and psychological healing.8 It involves examining one’s values, beliefs, and experiences to develop a deeper understanding of oneself and one’s place in the world.9

The concept of self refers to the essential core of an individual’s being, encompassing thoughts, feelings, and experiences.42 Philosophers have proposed various theories on the nature of self, broadly categorized into essentialism and nominalism.42

Essentialism argues that the self has an inherent, unchanging essence (e.g., Plato’s theory of forms), while nominalism contends that the self is merely a collection of attributes, experiences, and characteristics that are subject to change (e.g., David Hume’s bundle theory).42 Consciousness and embodiment are two crucial factors that contribute to the understanding of self, with some philosophers arguing consciousness is essential for the self, while others propose it is a byproduct of brain function.42

Personal reality is inherently subjective, shaped by an individual’s unique experiences, beliefs, emotions, and cognitive processes.16 The brain actively constructs theories to maintain a sense of consistency for all behaviors, absorbing stimuli and ordering them in unique and sometimes distorted ways to create this subjective reality.16 These subjective interpretations are stored as personal reality, impacting future experiences.16

Mindfulness is a practice that helps individuals notice their internal state, how it is influenced, and how it affects behavior, fostering a more realistic understanding of causality between inner and outer worlds.43 By breathing mindfully, for example, a stressed reality can be altered to one of calm and composure, changing the perception of resources and problems.43 Mindfulness leads to increased subjective well-being, reduced psychological symptoms, emotional reactivity, and improved behavioral regulation.44 It cultivates contact with “reality as it is,” paving the way for clearer present-moment awareness and more adequate responses.43

Existential reflection is a powerful tool for confronting the complexities of human existence and finding meaning in life.9 It involves exploring issues related to identity, morality, and values, cultivating self-awareness, resilience, and overall well-being.9 This process helps individuals examine their thoughts, feelings, and behaviors, leading to a greater understanding of their strengths, weaknesses, and motivations.9 It also aids in confronting uncertainty and ambiguity, embracing the unknown, and finding purpose in adversity.9

The concept of the “looking-glass self” illustrates how an individual’s self-concept is built through social interaction, by imagining how others perceive them and their judgments.45 This process reveals that identity is not a solitary construct but a co-creation, heavily influenced by social settings. In the digital age, this extends to the creation of multiple “cyber selves” (e.g., professional self on LinkedIn, casual self on Twitter) that are highly malleable and subject to continuous shaping and perfection based on perceived judgments.45 This deconstructs the notion of a fixed, singular personal reality, showing it as a dynamic alignment between internal and external worlds, constantly seeking equilibrium through social feedback.

Mindfulness, by helping to settle the mind and increase awareness of both internal and external events, provides a practical method for individuals to escape self-imposed mental narratives and connect with a more direct, less distorted perception of reality.43 This practice enables a deconstruction of “bleaker realities” that are often created by being out of touch with actual causes of experiences.43 By fostering an attitude of curiosity, openness, and acceptance towards moment-to-moment experience, mindfulness allows for a more conscious processing of events, sharpening perception and leading to insights into how things affect oneself and others.43 This is a path to a more adaptive engagement with the world, moving beyond automatic, often emotional, responses to a clearer understanding of “reality as it is.”

Part IV: Meaning: Purpose in a Deconstructed Existence

This section explores how meaning is conceived and constructed in a world where the nature of reality is increasingly deconstructed, examining philosophical stances like existentialism and nihilism, and contrasting them with spiritual perspectives.

Existentialism and the Creation of Meaning

Existentialism is a philosophy centered on human free will to determine the course of one’s life, emphasizing individual responsibility to create meaning rather than relying on a higher power or external sources.10 Its core tenet, “existence precedes essence,” suggests that individuals are not born with a pre-given nature or purpose but are contingently thrown into existence and must create who they are through their choices and actions.47

A significant aspect of existentialism is the acknowledgment of anxiety, which arises from the uncertainty about the changing nature of life’s meaning and the profound responsibility of making choices.46 This freedom, while empowering, can also be a burden. Existentialists advocate for authenticity, a life lived by breaking with tradition and social convention, courageously affirming the freedom and contingency of one’s condition, and committing to self-chosen, meaning-giving projects.47

Various philosophers have contributed to existential thought on meaning. Søren Kierkegaard, considered the father of existentialism, emphasized living as an individual within reality and believed meaning was tied directly to faith.46 Friedrich Nietzsche focused on the “will to power” and the re-evaluation of values.48 Leo Tolstoy found meaning in a kind of irrational knowledge called “faith”.48 In the 20th century, Martin Heidegger initially stated that authenticity was the hallmark of a meaningful life, later suggesting humanity’s duty as guardians of the world gave life meaning.49 Jean-Paul Sartre believed life was inherently meaningless but urged individuals to make free choices to give their lives purpose.48 Albert Camus also thought life was absurd and senseless but emphasized the importance of continuing forward despite life’s obstructions as a path to freedom.48

Existentialism’s core idea—that meaning is not discovered but created—is both a profound burden and a radical liberation. The burden stems from the anxiety of choice and the absence of an inherent, external purpose, which can lead to feelings of emptiness and disconnection.10 However, this perspective also offers radical liberation, granting full autonomy and responsibility for one’s life. This deconstructs the traditional search for a singular, external “meaning of life” and shifts it to an ongoing, personal act of creation, demanding courage and commitment to one’s self-chosen values and projects.10 It encourages individuals to look within themselves to find what is truly important, rather than seeking answers from external sources.

Nihilism: The Absence of Inherent Meaning

Nihilism encompasses various views that reject certain aspects of existence, including the belief that life is meaningless, that moral values are baseless, and that knowledge is impossible.50 The term, derived from the Latin nihil meaning ‘nothing,’ literally translates to ‘ideology of nothing’ or ‘ideology of negation’.50

Existential nihilism specifically asserts that life is inherently meaningless and lacks a higher purpose.50 This view suggests that all individual and societal achievements are ultimately pointless, which can lead to indifference, a lack of motivation, and existential crises.50 Some theorists link this view to human mortality, suggesting that the inevitability of death renders all human accomplishments transient and ultimately futile.50

Moral nihilism, a related view, denies the objective existence of morality, arguing that moral evaluations and practices rest on misguided assumptions without any substantial link to external reality.50

Friedrich Nietzsche described nihilism as the process in which “the highest values devaluate themselves,” leading to a profound crisis in human history.50 While often associated with extreme pessimism, a key difference is that pessimists see the world as inherently bad, whereas nihilists deny that it has any positive or negative meaning at all.50

Nihilism represents the most extreme deconstruction of meaning, stripping away all inherent value, purpose, and objective knowledge. This creates a “void” that can lead to despair and a sense of pointlessness.50 However, paradoxically, for some, this perceived absence of objective meaning prompts the creation of subjective values as a response. In this way, nihilism, by revealing the potential emptiness of existence, can push individuals towards the very existentialist themes of self-created meaning, demonstrating that even in the face of ultimate negation, the human drive to find or make purpose persists.

Spiritual Perspectives: Transcendent Meaning and Illusion

Spiritual perspectives offer diverse interpretations of reality and meaning, often diverging significantly from purely scientific or secular philosophical viewpoints.52

A common idea in spiritual awakening is the realization that physical reality is akin to a “dream” or a “cosmic illusion,” a manifestation of energy.52 This perspective suggests that the physical world is not the ultimate reality but merely a temporary stage or “show”.52 From this viewpoint, the soul is seen as a witness to mental and physical states, existing beyond life and death, encouraging detachment from material attachments and possessions.52

Many spiritual traditions posit consciousness as fundamental. For instance, some believe that God is pure consciousness who created individual consciousness (like humans) to experience itself.52 This suggests a profound interconnectedness, where all individual consciousnesses remain connected within a larger spiritual framework.52

This contrasts with strict materialism, which holds that immaterial concepts such as soul, spirit, and God are merely products of human thoughts, not part of objective reality.53

Dualism, however, offers another perspective, proposing that mind and matter independently contribute to anchoring the notion of reality, synthesizing idealistic views that champion consciousness with the existence of a material world.53

From a Christian perspective, reality is influenced by God and extends beyond the tangible to encompass a spiritual realm, with God as a living presence within reality.53 This worldview includes spiritual entities like angels and demons, and concepts of an afterlife and eternity.53 Scripture is considered a source of divine truth, and personal faith experiences are seen as deeply personal and transformative encounters with the divine, engendering a heightened awareness of spiritual dimensions within reality and deepening faith bonds.53 Human beings are viewed as both physical and spiritual entities, with the physical body serving as a vessel for earthly engagement, while the soul or spirit is an eternal facet of human reality, defying the bounds of time and space and representing true identity.53

Spiritual perspectives often frame earthly life as an “illusion” or “dream,” a “play” where the “soul is a witness” to the human experience.52 This metaphor profoundly deconstructs the perceived solidity and ultimate reality of the physical world. By encouraging detachment from material attachments and a focus on an “eternal consciousness,” this viewpoint redefines “reality” not as what is physically tangible, but as a deeper, underlying spiritual existence. This offers a path to meaning through internal transformation and a shift in perspective, rather than through external achievement or material accumulation. It suggests that true reality lies beyond the ephemeral physical realm, emphasizing the importance of inner experience and spiritual connection for a meaningful life.

Part V: Science Fiction as a Laboratory for Reality

Science fiction transcends mere entertainment, serving as a dynamic intellectual laboratory where the boundaries of reality, consciousness, and meaning are continuously explored and deconstructed.

Exploring Multiverses and Alternate Realities

Science fiction frequently explores the concept of parallel universes, hypothetical universes that mirror our own but diverge significantly due to different choices or altered historical events.54 Authors often craft intricate

multiverses, extensive networks of parallel universes where characters may frequently interact across these distinct realities, as seen in Stephen King’s Dark Tower series, where characters travel to save all existence, creating an interconnectedness among King’s various novels.54

The film Everything Everywhere All At Once offers a vibrant exploration of the multiverse, highlighting themes of escapism, endless potential, and the existence of alternate, seemingly better versions of oneself.55 In the narrative, characters “verse jump” by performing unusual actions, allowing them to tap into the minds and experiences of their alternate selves and gain their abilities.56 Beyond its fantastical elements, the film is rooted in real-world themes concerning immigrant families, mother-daughter relationships, and confronting personal expectations for one’s life.56

Similarly, the TV series Dark Matter explores alternate versions of life and personal reality through the experiences of its protagonist, Jason Dessen, a physicist abducted into an alternate version of his life.57 His initial wonder quickly turns into a nightmare as he attempts to return to his original reality amidst a “mind-bending landscape of lives he could have lived”.57 The series depicts his harrowing journey through this “labyrinth of realities” as he strives to get back to his true family and protect them from a formidable foe: himself, suggesting that the exploration of alternate lives is deeply intertwined with Jason’s personal identity and the choices he has made, or could have made.57

Science fiction’s exploration of multiverses, as exemplified by Everything Everywhere All At Once and Dark Matter, functions as a profound existential mirror. These narratives force characters and audiences to confront the “road not taken” and the myriad “alternate versions of themselves” that might exist across different realities.55 This effectively deconstructs the singular, linear narrative of personal identity, highlighting the psychological weight of potential realities and the inherent contingency of one’s chosen path. This prompts deep reflection on themes of regret, fulfillment, and the very nature of self as it exists across a landscape of possible lives, suggesting that identity is not fixed but fluid and potentially distributed across an infinite set of experiences.

Deconstructing Consciousness and Identity

Science fiction consistently challenges and deconstructs traditional notions of consciousness and identity, often through speculative technologies and scenarios.

The film Altered States delves into themes of altered realities and consciousness through the character of Edward Jessup, a psychopathologist experimenting with sensory deprivation and psychoactive drugs.58 His experiments lead to increasingly drastic visions and even physical biological devolution, transforming him into a primordial mass of conscious matter.58 The film questions whether “our other states of consciousness are as real as our waking states” 58, blurring the lines between mental experience and physical reality.

The TV series Altered Carbon explores consciousness transfer through “cortical stacks,” advanced hard drives implanted in the brainstem that record a person’s consciousness and memories.59 This technology allows for a form of immortality, as a stack can be transferred to a new body or “sleeve” after death.59 The series delves into the implications for identity, suggesting that the physical body is a mutable aspect separate from core consciousness, and raising questions about gender identity and social stratification in a world where bodies are interchangeable.59

Films like Blade Runner and Ex Machina directly engage with the nature of humanity by portraying bioengineered beings (replicants) or artificial intelligences (AIs) that are nearly indistinguishable from humans and possess the capacity for subjective experience and emotion.7 These narratives raise fundamental questions about their consciousness and whether they should be treated as humans, thereby deconstructing the traditional boundaries of what defines “human” and “identity”.7

Ex Machina further explores the ethical implications of creating conscious beings and the criteria used to determine consciousness.7

Science fiction utilizes technological advancements such as consciousness transfer, artificial intelligence, and altered states to push the boundaries of what it means to be “human” and to possess “identity.” This approach deconstructs traditional notions of the self, forcing a re-evaluation of what constitutes consciousness, personhood, and even existence itself.7 By presenting hypothetical scenarios involving conscious machines or disembodied minds, science fiction prompts critical ethical questions about rights, moral responsibilities, and the nature of being in a technologically advanced future, blurring the lines between biological and artificial life and challenging the very foundations of human exceptionalism.

Simulated Realities and the Nature of Knowledge

The film The Matrix presents a central premise of a sophisticated computer simulation mistaken for reality, forcing viewers to question “what is real?” and the reliability of their senses.60 This scenario directly challenges the nature of knowledge and experience.

The film draws striking parallels to classic philosophical thought experiments and allegories. It echoes Plato’s Cave Allegory, where prisoners mistake shadows for reality, with the simulated world acting as the cave and the true world existing outside.60 It also evokes René Descartes’ thought experiment of an evil demon deceiving humans about the nature of reality, with the artificial intelligence in

The Matrix playing the role of the deceiver.60 Further connections are drawn to the “Brain in a Vat” scenario and Robert Nozick’s “Experience Machine,” which explore the implications of a mind experiencing a simulated reality.60

The Matrix challenges viewers to consider how knowledge is acquired and whether sensory experiences can be trusted as sources of information about the world.60 It presents a scenario where sensory experiences are completely divorced from physical reality, raising profound questions about the nature of consciousness and the relationship between mind and body.60

Beyond its philosophical questions, The Matrix can be interpreted as a critique of modern society, commenting on increasing technological dependence, mass media manipulation, consumerism, and the potential for these factors to disconnect individuals from “true” reality and foster social control.60

The Matrix serves as a powerful contemporary re-imagining of ancient philosophical questions about reality, drawing explicit parallels to Plato’s Cave and Descartes’ Evil Demon. However, it introduces a technological rather than a metaphysical deceiver, which resonates deeply with modern anxieties about digital immersion and artificial intelligence.60 This narrative effectively deconstructs the perceived solidity of everyday reality by highlighting the fragility of sensory experience and the potential for manipulation. By doing so, it prompts a critical examination of societal structures, our reliance on technology, and fundamentally questions the very basis of human knowledge and freedom, pushing audiences to consider if their own reality might be a construct.

Science Fiction as a Thought Experiment and Cultural Mirror

Science fiction functions as more than just a genre; it is a powerful tool for intellectual exploration and cultural reflection. It allows for the exploration of complex ideas and hypothetical scenarios, extrapolating current trends and technologies into the future to comment on the present, issue warnings, or inspire new possibilities.5

The genre plays a crucial role in shaping public perception of the future and the potential of science and technology.5 It often reflects and comments on contemporary social issues, using metaphors to explore themes such as prejudice, identity, and social justice, as seen in the

X-Men franchise.5

Science fiction has a remarkable track record of inspiring technological innovation, predicting and influencing the development of real-world technologies. Examples include handheld communicators inspiring smartphones, voice-controlled assistants like Siri and Alexa, virtual reality, self-driving cars, bionic limbs, genetic engineering, 3D printing, augmented reality, and gesture-based interfaces.63 It pushes human imagination, helping to conceptualize and eventually realize technologies that once seemed absurd.65

Beyond inspiration, science fiction also serves as a critique and warning, exploring the dangers and imperfections of technological and societal changes in the human experience.5 It illuminates the complexities of human nature and challenges individuals to confront questions about morality, identity, and the consequences of their actions.65

The interplay between science fiction and philosophy is significant, as SF concretizes philosophical explorations and addresses “the big issues confronting humanity”.6 It can illustrate or challenge philosophical theories, providing new perspectives and encouraging further inquiry.7 While not always based on actual science, SF constructs worlds consistent with logic and mind, enabling reflection on fundamental aspects of intelligence and the relationship between humanity and technology.6

Science fiction operates not merely as entertainment but as a “prophetic” genre that both reflects societal anxieties and aspirations and actively “shapes our reality” by inspiring technological innovation and influencing public discourse.5 This dynamic interplay means that science fiction is not merely a commentary on existence but an active participant in its ongoing construction and deconstruction. By envisioning future possibilities—from utopian societies in

Star Trek to dystopian warnings like The Handmaid’s Tale—it blurs the line between imagination and future actuality, demonstrating how speculative narratives can influence the trajectory of scientific development, ethical considerations, and societal norms.

Conclusion: The Evolving Tapestry of Existence

The enduring quest to define reality reveals it not as a singular, fixed concept, but as a complex, evolving tapestry woven from objective, subjective, and intersubjective threads. Scientific advancements, particularly in cosmology and quantum mechanics, continually push the boundaries of what is considered objective reality. Theories like eternal inflation and string theory’s landscape of universes suggest a cosmos far vaster and more diverse than previously imagined, challenging the notion of a unique, finely-tuned universe and shifting the cosmological paradigm towards a statistical ensemble of possibilities. However, these theories also confront the inherent limits of empirical verification, raising fundamental questions about what constitutes “scientific” knowledge when faced with unobservable or causally disconnected realms.

Simultaneously, philosophical inquiries into idealism and solipsism, alongside psychological studies of perception and self-reflection, highlight the profound and active role of the mind in constructing personal reality. The “Hard Problem of Consciousness” underscores the mystery of subjective experience, leading some to propose consciousness as a fundamental aspect of reality itself, capable of influencing quantum phenomena. Human perception, far from being a passive reception of external data, is revealed as a dynamic process shaped by physiological, cultural, and psychological filters, demonstrating that even our “objective” experiences are deeply mediated and intersubjectively constructed.

In this intricate interplay, meaning itself emerges not as a pre-ordained truth but as a dynamic, often self-authored, endeavor. Existentialism places the burden and liberation of meaning-making squarely on the individual, emphasizing free will and personal responsibility in a world devoid of inherent purpose. Nihilism, while representing the ultimate deconstruction of value, paradoxically compels a re-evaluation that can lead back to the creation of subjective meaning. Spiritual traditions offer transcendent frameworks, often viewing physical reality as an illusion or a temporary stage, encouraging a detachment that redefines meaning within a deeper, eternal consciousness.

Science fiction, as a unique cultural and intellectual laboratory, plays a crucial role in this ongoing deconstruction and reconstruction of existence. Through its exploration of multiverses, simulated realities, and consciousness transfer, it provides thought experiments that allow humanity to grapple with alternate selves, the fluidity of identity, and the very nature of knowledge in a technologically advanced world. By mirroring societal anxieties and inspiring technological innovation, science fiction actively participates in shaping the future, blurring the lines between imagination and actuality.

Ultimately, the journey through multiverse, mind, and meaning is not about arriving at a definitive answer to “What is reality?” but rather about continuously deconstructing and re-constructing understanding. It is an acknowledgment that reality is a multifaceted phenomenon, perpetually redefined by scientific discovery, philosophical inquiry, personal experience, and the boundless human imagination. The quest continues, driven by curiosity and the profound implications for what it means to exist.

Works cited

1. Reality – Wikipedia, accessed August 5, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reality
2. Question Reality! Science, philosophy, a search for meaning Specialization – Coursera, accessed August 5, 2025, https://www.coursera.org/specializations/question-reality-science-philosophy
3. Understanding Reality – Number Analytics, accessed August 5, 2025, https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/ultimate-guide-to-reality
4. DartmouthX: Question Reality! Science, philosophy, and the search for meaning – edX, accessed August 5, 2025, https://www.edx.org/learn/philosophy/dartmouth-college-question-reality-science-philosophy-and-the-search-for-meaning
5. Exploring Thought Experiments in Science Fiction – Number Analytics, accessed August 5, 2025, https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/thought-experiments-in-science-fiction
6. Science Fiction and Philosophy: An Encounter in the Future – Berggruen Institute, accessed August 5, 2025, https://berggruen.org/news/science-fiction-and-philosophy-an-encounter-in-the-future-report
7. Consciousness in Sci-Fi and Philosophy – Number Analytics, accessed August 5, 2025, https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/hard-problem-of-consciousness
8. 25 Self-Reflection Questions: Why Introspection Is Important – Positive Psychology, accessed August 5, 2025, https://positivepsychology.com/introspection-self-reflection/
9. The Ultimate Guide to Existential Reflection – Number Analytics, accessed August 5, 2025, https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/ultimate-guide-existential-reflection-human-existence
10. Finding purpose and connection amidst the chaos of life – Richland Oaks Counseling Center, accessed August 5, 2025, http://www.richlandoaks.org/rocc-blog/2023/3/27/finding-purpose-and-connection-amidst-the-chaos-of-life
11. Subjectivity and objectivity (philosophy) – Wikipedia, accessed August 5, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subjectivity_and_objectivity_(philosophy)
12. What exactly do ‘objective’ and ‘subjective’ mean in contemporary philosophy?, accessed August 5, 2025, https://philosophy.stackexchange.com/questions/8384/what-exactly-do-objective-and-subjective-mean-in-contemporary-philosophy
13. www.psychofuturia.com, accessed August 5, 2025, https://www.psychofuturia.com/nature-of-reality-according-to-philo-science/#:~:text=In%20scientific%20terms%2C%20reality%20refers,of%20the%20world%20around%20us.
14. The Difference Between Objective and Subjective Reality | Corporate Coach Group, accessed August 5, 2025, https://corporatecoachgroup.com/blog/the-difference-between-objective-and-subjective-reality
15. Does objective reality exist? – Wikiversity, accessed August 5, 2025, https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Does_objective_reality_exist%3F
16. The Illusion of Objectivity: Understanding Subjective Reality – Psychology Fanatic, accessed August 5, 2025, https://psychologyfanatic.com/subjective-reality/
17. Intersubjectivity – Oxford Reference, accessed August 5, 2025, https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803100008603
18. Is Objective Reality really just the Subjective Agreement of a given group? – Philosophy Stack Exchange, accessed August 5, 2025, https://philosophy.stackexchange.com/questions/30495/is-objective-reality-really-just-the-subjective-agreement-of-a-given-group
19. THE PERCEPTION OF REALITY – University of Hawaii System, accessed August 5, 2025, https://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/DPF.CHAP7.HTM
20. Idealism, accessed August 5, 2025, https://www.qcc.cuny.edu/socialSciences/ppecorino/INTRO_TEXT/Chapter%204%20Metaphysics/Idealism.htm
21. Reality and Appearance: A Philosophical Debate – Number Analytics, accessed August 5, 2025, https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/reality-appearance-plato-aristotle-debate
22. Idealism – Wikipedia, accessed August 5, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idealism
23. Solipsism | EBSCO Research Starters, accessed August 5, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/religion-and-philosophy/solipsism
24. Solipsism – Wikipedia, accessed August 5, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solipsism
25. Objects of Perception – Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed August 5, 2025, https://iep.utm.edu/perc-obj/
26. Inflationary cosmology and the multiverse – ELWYN’S BIG BANG PAGE – Weebly, accessed August 5, 2025, https://elwynsbigbangpage.weebly.com/inflationary-cosmology-and-the-multiverse.html
27. The Top Three Multiverse Theories: Many Worlds, Bubble Universes, And Shadow Matter, accessed August 5, 2025, https://www.adlerplanetarium.org/blog/top-multiverse-theories-niyah-and-the-multiverse/
28. Multiverse theories and eternal inflation | Cosmology Class Notes – Fiveable, accessed August 5, 2025, https://library.fiveable.me/cosmology/unit-14/multiverse-theories-eternal-inflation/study-guide/zgaOUTOvvizrctB8
29. Multiverse – Wikipedia, accessed August 5, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiverse
30. String theory – Wikipedia, accessed August 5, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/String_theory
31. Multiverse – Critiques, Theories, Evidence | Britannica, accessed August 5, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/science/multiverse/Critiques-of-multiverse-theories
32. The Observer Effect — How Observing Changes Reality | by …, accessed August 5, 2025, https://medium.com/@quantumglyphs1/the-observer-effect-how-observing-changes-reality-0202abadcaf8
33. Observer effect (physics) – Wikipedia, accessed August 5, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Observer_effect_(physics)
34. Many-worlds interpretation – Wikipedia, accessed August 5, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Many-worlds_interpretation
35. Multiverse interpretation of quantum mechanics | Phys. Rev. D, accessed August 5, 2025, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.85.045007
36. A New Quantum Theory Reveals Reality Is Scarier Than We Thought & It Could Solve all the Paradoxes – YouTube, accessed August 5, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rZWDZYmenPA&pp=0gcJCfwAo7VqN5tD
37. Resolving Quantum Foundational Paradoxes Through Our Consciousness Framework | by Yogesh Bagle | Medium, accessed August 5, 2025, https://medium.com/@yogsbags/resolving-quantum-foundational-paradoxes-through-our-consciousness-framework-d366c46cacbd
38. CAN SCIENCE OFFER AN ULTIMATE EXPLANATION OF REALITY? – Revistas Comillas, accessed August 5, 2025, https://revistas.comillas.edu/index.php/pensamiento/article/download/4668/4484/10581
39. 20th WCP: The Limits of Science, accessed August 5, 2025, https://www.bu.edu/wcp/Papers/Scie/ScieGher.htm
40. Consciousness | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed August 5, 2025, https://iep.utm.edu/consciousness/
41. Is Consciousness The Final Reality? – Questioning The Material Universe | Dr. Bernardo Kastrup – YouTube, accessed August 5, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FcaV3EEmR9k&pp=0gcJCfwAo7VqN5tD
42. The Philosophy of Self – Number Analytics, accessed August 5, 2025, https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/philosophy-of-self-personal-identity
43. The Realism of Mindfulness – Awaris, accessed August 5, 2025, https://awaris.co.uk/the-realism-of-mindfulness/
44. Effects of Mindfulness on Psychological Health: A Review of Empirical Studies – PMC, accessed August 5, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3679190/
45. Perception Is Reality: The Looking-Glass Self | Lesley University, accessed August 5, 2025, https://lesley.edu/article/perception-is-reality-the-looking-glass-self
46. What to Know About Existentialism—Philosophy and Existential Therapy – Verywell Mind, accessed August 5, 2025, https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-existentialism-5667161
47. Existentialism – Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed August 5, 2025, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/existentialism/
48. Meaning of Life, The: Early Continental and Analytic Perspectives | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed August 5, 2025, https://iep.utm.edu/mean-ear/
49. Meaning of life | EBSCO Research Starters, accessed August 5, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/religion-and-philosophy/meaning-life
50. Nihilism – Wikipedia, accessed August 5, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nihilism
51. Nihilism | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed August 5, 2025, https://iep.utm.edu/nihilism/
52. When people who had a spiritual awakening say that reality is an illusion, what do they mean exactly? – Reddit, accessed August 5, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/spirituality/comments/1elfl0f/when_people_who_had_a_spiritual_awakening_say/
53. What is reality? – Faith on View, accessed August 5, 2025, https://www.faithonview.com/what-is-reality/
54. Parallel universes in fiction | EBSCO Research Starters, accessed August 5, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/literature-and-writing/parallel-universes-fiction
55. stuyspec.com, accessed August 5, 2025, https://stuyspec.com/article/everything-everywhere-all-at-once-finds-meaning-in-the-multiverse#:~:text=It%20explores%20the%20modern%20dangers,seemingly%20better%20versions%20of%20ourselves.
56. The Science Behind the Multiverse in ‘Everything Everywhere All At …, accessed August 5, 2025, https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/the-science-behind-the-multiverse-in-everything-everywhere-all-at-once-180981796/
57. Dark Matter – Apple TV+ Press, accessed August 5, 2025, https://www.apple.com/tv-pr/originals/dark-matter/
58. Altered States – Wikipedia, accessed August 5, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Altered_States
59. Altered Carbon (TV series) – Wikipedia, accessed August 5, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Altered_Carbon_(TV_series)
60. The Matrix and Philosophy | Summary, Quotes, FAQ, Audio – SoBrief, accessed August 5, 2025, https://sobrief.com/books/the-matrix-and-philosophy
61. The Philosophical Concepts Behind “The Matrix” – 930 Words | Essay Example – IvyPanda, accessed August 5, 2025, https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-philosophical-concepts-behind-the-matrix/
62. Exploring Philosophy through Sci-Fi – Number Analytics, accessed August 5, 2025, https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/philosophy-in-science-fiction
63. Science Fiction Technologies That Became a Reality – discoverscifi.com, accessed August 5, 2025, https://discoverscifi.com/science-fiction-technologies-that-became-a-reality/
64. Exploring the Influence of Science-Fiction: How Are Sci-Fi Novels an Agent in the Construction of Reality? – ResearchGate, accessed August 5, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372144534_Exploring_the_Influence_of_Science-Fiction_How_Are_Sci-Fi_Novels_an_Agent_in_the_Construction_of_Reality
65. Reality’s True Reflections: The Unique Power of Science Fiction – Hollywood Insider, accessed August 5, 2025, https://www.hollywoodinsider.com/power-of-science-fiction/